THE DOCTRINE OF SIGNATURES: A WARFARE BETWEEN MYTH AND REALITY

D. Patil
{"title":"THE DOCTRINE OF SIGNATURES: A WARFARE BETWEEN MYTH AND REALITY","authors":"D. Patil","doi":"10.1234/LSL.V59I0.210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The plants and animals, from the very beginning of their existence, are being studied by two widely distinct standpoints viz., (i) the philosophical and (ii) the utilitarian. The plants especially from the latter standpoint were/are studied as a source of medicine and agriculture.  The science of medicine was/is based on ‘cause and effects’, apart from certain other theories and philosophies. One such philosophy is ‘the doctrine of signatures’. However, it has been criticized since its beginning. The present communication is the result of analysis of the knowledge of ancients and author’s own observations. It is aimed at inviting attention of intellectuals to revive  and point out relevance in its totality.The paper sheds light on history and development of this doctrine, contributions of pioneers, types of signature, background of planetary influence, comparison of signatures from ethnomedicine to modern medicine, echo of doctrine of signatures on common plant names in various human societies, various views of proponents and opponents of the doctrine, etc. It is concluded that the drug sources based on the doctrine alongwith verification on scientific lines is a better way to human welfare.KEY WORDS: Doctrine of signatures, History, Myth, Reality.","PeriodicalId":18074,"journal":{"name":"LIFE SCIENCES LEAFLETS","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIFE SCIENCES LEAFLETS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1234/LSL.V59I0.210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT:The plants and animals, from the very beginning of their existence, are being studied by two widely distinct standpoints viz., (i) the philosophical and (ii) the utilitarian. The plants especially from the latter standpoint were/are studied as a source of medicine and agriculture.  The science of medicine was/is based on ‘cause and effects’, apart from certain other theories and philosophies. One such philosophy is ‘the doctrine of signatures’. However, it has been criticized since its beginning. The present communication is the result of analysis of the knowledge of ancients and author’s own observations. It is aimed at inviting attention of intellectuals to revive  and point out relevance in its totality.The paper sheds light on history and development of this doctrine, contributions of pioneers, types of signature, background of planetary influence, comparison of signatures from ethnomedicine to modern medicine, echo of doctrine of signatures on common plant names in various human societies, various views of proponents and opponents of the doctrine, etc. It is concluded that the drug sources based on the doctrine alongwith verification on scientific lines is a better way to human welfare.KEY WORDS: Doctrine of signatures, History, Myth, Reality.
签名原则:神话与现实之间的战争
摘要:对植物和动物的研究,从一开始就有两种截然不同的观点:(1)哲学观点和(2)功利观点。特别是从后者的角度来看,这些植物被研究作为医药和农业的来源。医学的基础是“因果关系”,而不是某些其他的理论和哲学。其中一种哲学就是“签名主义”。然而,它从一开始就受到批评。现在的交流是对古人知识的分析和作者自己的观察的结果。它旨在引起知识分子的注意,以恢复并指出其整体的相关性。本文阐述了该学说的历史和发展、先行者的贡献、签名的类型、行星影响的背景、民族医学与现代医学签名的比较、不同人类社会中常见植物名称签名学说的回响、该学说的支持者和反对者的各种观点等。结论是,以学说为基础的药物来源,加上科学的验证,是一种更好的人类福利方式。关键词:签名主义,历史,神话,现实
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信