Evaluation of the AERMOD dispersion model as a function of atmospheric stability for an urban area

Ashok Kumar, S. Dixit, C. Varadarajan, A. Vijayan, Anand Masuraha
{"title":"Evaluation of the AERMOD dispersion model as a function of atmospheric stability for an urban area","authors":"Ashok Kumar, S. Dixit, C. Varadarajan, A. Vijayan, Anand Masuraha","doi":"10.1002/EP.10129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The AERMOD dispersion model was used to compute ambient air concentrations of SO2 for 1-, 3-, and 24-h averaging periods using the emission inventory data for Lucas County, Ohio for the year 1990. The estimated concentrations were classified based on the stability parameter, Monin–Obukhov length (L), for the two monitoring stations located in the area. The data were divided into two atmospheric stability classes (stable and convective cases) as used in the AERMOD model. These categories were further grouped into five subcategories based on the value of L to learn about fine details of model performance. The model evaluation was done using several statistical parameters used in air quality studies. \n \nAERMOD did not yield a satisfactory performance in predicting 1- and 3-h average concentrations for the multisource region but showed a slightly better performance in predicting the 24-h concentrations using urban option for the land use parameters. The model had a tendency to underpredict in both the stable and convective cases. In the 24-h averaging period factor of two (Fa2) values suggested a better performance than fractional bias (FB). The model seemed to perform better for the Main Street station than the Collins Park station. Limited analysis using different land use parameters reported in the paper indicates that model performance may improve for certain cases. Other errors include the unavoidable scatter arising from differences between wind direction and actual transport for an averaging period, formulation of the model, and the emission inventory. The results of the study should be used cautiously because of the limited scope of the evaluation. Future work should focus on the role of land use parameters in predicting concentrations at the monitors and finding ways to quantify errors attributed to other factors. However, it is clear that more guidance is needed to apply the AERMOD model for multisource regions. Alternative schemes to divide the data should also be considered for analyzing model performance. © 2006 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2006","PeriodicalId":11769,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Progress","volume":"9 1","pages":"141-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"86","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/EP.10129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 86

Abstract

The AERMOD dispersion model was used to compute ambient air concentrations of SO2 for 1-, 3-, and 24-h averaging periods using the emission inventory data for Lucas County, Ohio for the year 1990. The estimated concentrations were classified based on the stability parameter, Monin–Obukhov length (L), for the two monitoring stations located in the area. The data were divided into two atmospheric stability classes (stable and convective cases) as used in the AERMOD model. These categories were further grouped into five subcategories based on the value of L to learn about fine details of model performance. The model evaluation was done using several statistical parameters used in air quality studies. AERMOD did not yield a satisfactory performance in predicting 1- and 3-h average concentrations for the multisource region but showed a slightly better performance in predicting the 24-h concentrations using urban option for the land use parameters. The model had a tendency to underpredict in both the stable and convective cases. In the 24-h averaging period factor of two (Fa2) values suggested a better performance than fractional bias (FB). The model seemed to perform better for the Main Street station than the Collins Park station. Limited analysis using different land use parameters reported in the paper indicates that model performance may improve for certain cases. Other errors include the unavoidable scatter arising from differences between wind direction and actual transport for an averaging period, formulation of the model, and the emission inventory. The results of the study should be used cautiously because of the limited scope of the evaluation. Future work should focus on the role of land use parameters in predicting concentrations at the monitors and finding ways to quantify errors attributed to other factors. However, it is clear that more guidance is needed to apply the AERMOD model for multisource regions. Alternative schemes to divide the data should also be considered for analyzing model performance. © 2006 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2006
评价AERMOD色散模式对城市地区大气稳定性的影响
利用1990年俄亥俄州卢卡斯县的排放清单数据,采用AERMOD分散模型计算了1、3和24小时平均周期的环境空气SO2浓度。根据该地区两个监测站的稳定性参数莫宁-奥布霍夫长度(L)对估计浓度进行分类。根据AERMOD模式,将数据分为两类大气稳定性(稳定和对流情况)。根据L的值将这些类别进一步分为五个子类别,以了解模型性能的细节。模型评估是使用空气质量研究中使用的几个统计参数完成的。AERMOD在预测多源区域1 h和3 h平均浓度方面表现不理想,但在土地利用参数的城市选项预测24 h浓度方面表现稍好。该模式在稳定和对流情况下都有低估的趋势。在24 h平均周期内,两个因子(Fa2)值的表现优于分数偏差(FB)。该模型似乎在主街站比柯林斯公园站表现得更好。本文中使用不同土地利用参数的有限分析表明,在某些情况下,模型的性能可能会有所改善。其他误差包括由于平均时期的风向和实际输送量的不同而不可避免的散射、模型的制定和排放清单。由于评估的范围有限,研究结果应谨慎使用。今后的工作应侧重于土地利用参数在预测监测站浓度方面的作用,并寻找方法来量化归因于其他因素的误差。然而,很明显,在多源区域应用AERMOD模型需要更多的指导。在分析模型性能时,还应考虑划分数据的备选方案。©2006美国化学工程师学会环境项目,2006
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信