A contribution for the study of RTM effect in height anomalies at two future IHRS stations in Brazil using different approaches, harmonic correction, and global density model

IF 0.9 Q4 REMOTE SENSING
T. L. Rodrigues
{"title":"A contribution for the study of RTM effect in height anomalies at two future IHRS stations in Brazil using different approaches, harmonic correction, and global density model","authors":"T. L. Rodrigues","doi":"10.1515/jogs-2022-0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The high-frequency effects of the gravity field can be obtained from residual terrain modeling (RTM) technique. However, for the International height reference system (IHRS), this is an open problem. Over the last decades, various approaches have been proposed for the practical solution of Newton’s Integral, such as point-mass, tesseroid, prism, and polyhedron. Harmonic correction (HC) and the use of more realistic mass density values have also been studied. In this work, in order to calculate RTM height anomalies at BRAZ and PPTE IHRS future stations in Brazil, such approaches and issues have been evaluated. Density values have been obtained from CRUST 1.0 global model. For the HC, the traditional mass condensation technique and Poisson’s equation have been used. The resulting values proposed by different approaches are very close to each other, with differences at the submillimeter-level. The RTM height anomaly values reached 1.5 and 1.4 mm at the BRAZ and PPTE stations, respectively. HC at BRAZ station can be disregarded without prejudice since its order of magnitude was 10−5 m. The use of CRUST 1.0 density values has proposed slight improvements of 0.8 and 0. 4 mm at BRAZ and PPTE station, respectively, in relation to the use of Harkness constant density value.","PeriodicalId":44569,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodetic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodetic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2022-0140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The high-frequency effects of the gravity field can be obtained from residual terrain modeling (RTM) technique. However, for the International height reference system (IHRS), this is an open problem. Over the last decades, various approaches have been proposed for the practical solution of Newton’s Integral, such as point-mass, tesseroid, prism, and polyhedron. Harmonic correction (HC) and the use of more realistic mass density values have also been studied. In this work, in order to calculate RTM height anomalies at BRAZ and PPTE IHRS future stations in Brazil, such approaches and issues have been evaluated. Density values have been obtained from CRUST 1.0 global model. For the HC, the traditional mass condensation technique and Poisson’s equation have been used. The resulting values proposed by different approaches are very close to each other, with differences at the submillimeter-level. The RTM height anomaly values reached 1.5 and 1.4 mm at the BRAZ and PPTE stations, respectively. HC at BRAZ station can be disregarded without prejudice since its order of magnitude was 10−5 m. The use of CRUST 1.0 density values has proposed slight improvements of 0.8 and 0. 4 mm at BRAZ and PPTE station, respectively, in relation to the use of Harkness constant density value.
基于不同方法、谐波校正和全球密度模式研究RTM对巴西未来两个IHRS站高度异常的影响
残差地形建模(RTM)技术可以获得重力场的高频效应。然而,对于国际高度参考系统(IHRS)来说,这是一个悬而未决的问题。在过去的几十年里,人们提出了各种各样的方法来解决牛顿积分的实际问题,如点质量、曲面、棱镜和多面体。谐波校正(HC)和使用更真实的质量密度值也进行了研究。为了计算巴西BRAZ和PPTE IHRS未来站的RTM高度异常,本文对这些方法和问题进行了评价。密度值由地壳1.0全球模型获得。对于HC,采用了传统的质量凝聚技术和泊松方程。不同方法得到的结果值非常接近,只有亚毫米级的差异。BRAZ站和PPTE站RTM高度异常值分别达到1.5和1.4 mm。由于BRAZ站的HC的数量级为10 ~ 5 m,因此可以忽略不计。使用CRUST 1.0的密度值提出了0.8和0的轻微改进。4毫米在BRAZ和PPTE站分别,有关哈克尼斯常数密度值的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geodetic Science
Journal of Geodetic Science REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
3
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信