Singapore’s Open Digital Token Offering Embrace: Context & Consequences

IF 1.4 Q3 ECONOMICS
R. Greene, David Lee Kuo Chuen
{"title":"Singapore’s Open Digital Token Offering Embrace: Context & Consequences","authors":"R. Greene, David Lee Kuo Chuen","doi":"10.31585/JBBA-2-2-(3)2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overall global public’s ability to purchase some portion of a digital token project’s initial batch of tokens is the defining feature of an open digital token offering. Using a dataset that differentiates this token distribution model from other varieties – a distinction often underemphasised in regional analyses of digital token sale trends – this research estimates 2017-18 open digital token offering activity by jurisdiction, finding that Singapore-registered projects accounted for 21 percent of Q3/Q4 2018 dollar-volume, more than any other country. Conversely, by late 2018, previous hubs of this distribution model represented a much smaller share. Reasons for Singapore’s rise as a global hub of the open digital token offering are explored, with a particular focus on examining contrasting regulatory approaches to distinguishing between this token distribution model and traditional securities offerings. Notably, 11 percent of Singapore-registered Q3/Q4 2018 token offering dollar-volume was purely-private, versus 94 percent in the U.S. Policy considerations related to this distribution method and the open digital token offering are presented, as are contrasting outcomes: this research estimates that over 70 percent of Singapore’s one-to-two-year-old open token offerings resulted in operational networks or minimum-viable-products, versus fewer than 40 percent of U.S. private sales. Also, about 40 percent of smart contract platform projects that conducted 2017-18 token sales were Singapore-registered – many more than in any other country. For reasons explored in this research, these findings support the view that open digital token offerings benefit projects aiming to concurrently raise funds, build up a user-base, and incentivise technologists to contribute to project development. Moreover, risks to retail participants posed by this distribution method are manageable. Singapore’s policy approach towards open digital token offerings has benefited the Lion City, which was likely home to more digital token projects that conducted 2018 token sales than any other city in the world.","PeriodicalId":33145,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of The British Blockchain Association","volume":"445 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of The British Blockchain Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31585/JBBA-2-2-(3)2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The overall global public’s ability to purchase some portion of a digital token project’s initial batch of tokens is the defining feature of an open digital token offering. Using a dataset that differentiates this token distribution model from other varieties – a distinction often underemphasised in regional analyses of digital token sale trends – this research estimates 2017-18 open digital token offering activity by jurisdiction, finding that Singapore-registered projects accounted for 21 percent of Q3/Q4 2018 dollar-volume, more than any other country. Conversely, by late 2018, previous hubs of this distribution model represented a much smaller share. Reasons for Singapore’s rise as a global hub of the open digital token offering are explored, with a particular focus on examining contrasting regulatory approaches to distinguishing between this token distribution model and traditional securities offerings. Notably, 11 percent of Singapore-registered Q3/Q4 2018 token offering dollar-volume was purely-private, versus 94 percent in the U.S. Policy considerations related to this distribution method and the open digital token offering are presented, as are contrasting outcomes: this research estimates that over 70 percent of Singapore’s one-to-two-year-old open token offerings resulted in operational networks or minimum-viable-products, versus fewer than 40 percent of U.S. private sales. Also, about 40 percent of smart contract platform projects that conducted 2017-18 token sales were Singapore-registered – many more than in any other country. For reasons explored in this research, these findings support the view that open digital token offerings benefit projects aiming to concurrently raise funds, build up a user-base, and incentivise technologists to contribute to project development. Moreover, risks to retail participants posed by this distribution method are manageable. Singapore’s policy approach towards open digital token offerings has benefited the Lion City, which was likely home to more digital token projects that conducted 2018 token sales than any other city in the world.
新加坡开放数字代币发行拥抱:背景与后果
全球公众购买数字代币项目初始代币的一部分的能力是开放数字代币产品的定义特征。该研究使用了一个将这种代币分布模型与其他品种区分开来的数据集——这一区别在数字代币销售趋势的区域分析中往往被低估——该研究估计了2017-18年按司法管辖区划分的开放数字代币发行活动,发现新加坡注册的项目占2018年第三季度/第四季度美元交易量的21%,高于其他任何国家。相反,到2018年底,这种分销模式的前几个中心所占的份额要小得多。本文探讨了新加坡作为开放数字代币发行的全球中心崛起的原因,特别侧重于研究对比的监管方法,以区分这种代币发行模式和传统证券发行。值得注意的是,在新加坡注册的2018年第三季度/第四季度代币发行美元交易量中,有11%是纯私人的,而在美国,与这种分配方法和开放数字代币发行相关的政策考虑为94%,对比结果是:这项研究估计,超过70%的新加坡一到两年的开放代币发行导致运营网络或最低可行产品,而美国私人销售的比例不到40%。此外,在2017-18年进行代币销售的智能合约平台项目中,约有40%是在新加坡注册的,比其他任何国家都要多。由于本研究探讨的原因,这些发现支持这样一种观点,即开放的数字代币产品有利于旨在同时筹集资金,建立用户基础并激励技术人员为项目开发做出贡献的项目。此外,这种分销方式给零售参与者带来的风险是可控的。新加坡对开放数字代币发行的政策方针使狮城受益,狮城可能是2018年进行代币销售的数字代币项目的所在地,比世界上任何其他城市都要多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信