Calibration of the fission-track dating method: Is Cu useful as an absolute thermal neutron fluence monitor?

F. De Corte , P. Van den haute , A. De Wispelaere , R. Jonckheere
{"title":"Calibration of the fission-track dating method: Is Cu useful as an absolute thermal neutron fluence monitor?","authors":"F. De Corte ,&nbsp;P. Van den haute ,&nbsp;A. De Wispelaere ,&nbsp;R. Jonckheere","doi":"10.1016/0168-9622(91)90048-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Thermal neutron fluence measurements have been performed with Au and Co standard monitors at the one side and Cu monitors (foils and wires) at the other. using three reactor channels with different neutron energy spectra and two calibrated Ge detectors. Care was taken to eliminate errors caused by epithermal activation and neutron self-shielding while special attention was also paid to the problem of incomplete annihilation of the <sup>64</sup>Cu <em>β</em><sup>+</sup> radiation. Our new measurements reveal consistent fluences between Cu and the Au and Co standard monitors, when using the recommended and/or recently evaluated nuclear parameters for the <sup>63</sup>Cu(n,γ)<sup>64</sup>Cu reaction. However, we do not endorse the usage of Cu as a standard fluence monitor for fission-track dating because from a metrological standpoint too large uncertainties still exist on some of its relevant nuclear parameters such as the thermal neutron activation cross-section (<em>σ</em><sub>0</sub>) of <sup>63</sup>Cu.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100231,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience section","volume":"86 3","pages":"Pages 187-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0168-9622(91)90048-2","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience section","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0168962291900482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Thermal neutron fluence measurements have been performed with Au and Co standard monitors at the one side and Cu monitors (foils and wires) at the other. using three reactor channels with different neutron energy spectra and two calibrated Ge detectors. Care was taken to eliminate errors caused by epithermal activation and neutron self-shielding while special attention was also paid to the problem of incomplete annihilation of the 64Cu β+ radiation. Our new measurements reveal consistent fluences between Cu and the Au and Co standard monitors, when using the recommended and/or recently evaluated nuclear parameters for the 63Cu(n,γ)64Cu reaction. However, we do not endorse the usage of Cu as a standard fluence monitor for fission-track dating because from a metrological standpoint too large uncertainties still exist on some of its relevant nuclear parameters such as the thermal neutron activation cross-section (σ0) of 63Cu.

裂变径迹定年法的校准:Cu作为绝对热中子通量监测仪有用吗?
热中子通量测量在一侧用Au和Co标准监测器,另一侧用Cu监测器(箔和导线)进行。使用三个中子能谱不同的反应堆通道和两个校准的锗探测器。注意消除由超热活化和中子自屏蔽引起的误差,同时特别注意64Cu β+辐射的不完全湮灭问题。我们的新测量结果显示,当使用推荐和/或最近评估的63Cu(n,γ)64Cu反应核参数时,Cu与Au和Co标准监测器之间存在一致的影响。然而,我们不赞成使用Cu作为裂变径迹测年的标准通量监测仪,因为从计量的角度来看,它的一些相关核参数(如63Cu的热中子活化截面(σ0))仍然存在太大的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信