An economic analysis of oil sands mining options

R. Suglo
{"title":"An economic analysis of oil sands mining options","authors":"R. Suglo","doi":"10.4314/GM.V11I1.53273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mining projects normally involve huge levels of capital outlay with their attendant high investment risks. Thus, all new mining projects and existing projects have to be economically evaluated to assess their viabilities and whether they add value to the company’s portfolio. Economic analysis is one of the best tools for evaluating and comparing different projects or investments options. Various economic evaluation criteria such as the Net Present Value, Profitability Index, Internal Rate of Return and Discounted Payback Period are commonly used, alone or in combination, to determine the acceptability or attractiveness of projects and to aid in the selection of the best investment ventures from a number of options. In this paper, economic, risk and sensitivity analyses were conducted on two oil sands mining options at Syncrude Mine in Canada. These are the Current Mining System (CMS) and the Cyclic Excavator Conveyor Belt Control System (CycEx CBCS). The results of detailed economic analysis show that the net present value (NPV) of the CMS option is $3.20 ´ 1010 while that for the CycEx CBCS option is $4.06 ´ 1010. The profitability indices for the CMS and CycEx CBCS options are 19.37 and 43.37 respectively. The internal rates of return of the CMS and CycEx CBCS options were calculated to be 29.02% and 33.37% respectively. Both the CMS and CycEx CBCS options have very short discounted payback periods (≤ 0.27 years). The results of risk characterisation of the two mining options show that there is 85% probability that the NPVs of the CMS and CycEx CBCS options will be greater than $2.69 ´ 1010 and $3.42 ´ 1010 respectively. The results of sensitivity analysis show that the input  variables that significantly affect the NPV in both mining options are the discount rate, production rate, oil price, exchange rate, and the federal and provincial tax rates. In general, changes in input parameters such as discount rate, scheduled mine production capacity and time, price of oil per barrel and total operating costs had lower effects on the NPV of the CycEx CBCS option than the CMS option. The calculated economic parameters together with the results of the risk and sensitivity analyses show that the CycEx CBCS option is more economically viable than the CMS option.","PeriodicalId":12530,"journal":{"name":"Ghana Mining Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana Mining Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/GM.V11I1.53273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mining projects normally involve huge levels of capital outlay with their attendant high investment risks. Thus, all new mining projects and existing projects have to be economically evaluated to assess their viabilities and whether they add value to the company’s portfolio. Economic analysis is one of the best tools for evaluating and comparing different projects or investments options. Various economic evaluation criteria such as the Net Present Value, Profitability Index, Internal Rate of Return and Discounted Payback Period are commonly used, alone or in combination, to determine the acceptability or attractiveness of projects and to aid in the selection of the best investment ventures from a number of options. In this paper, economic, risk and sensitivity analyses were conducted on two oil sands mining options at Syncrude Mine in Canada. These are the Current Mining System (CMS) and the Cyclic Excavator Conveyor Belt Control System (CycEx CBCS). The results of detailed economic analysis show that the net present value (NPV) of the CMS option is $3.20 ´ 1010 while that for the CycEx CBCS option is $4.06 ´ 1010. The profitability indices for the CMS and CycEx CBCS options are 19.37 and 43.37 respectively. The internal rates of return of the CMS and CycEx CBCS options were calculated to be 29.02% and 33.37% respectively. Both the CMS and CycEx CBCS options have very short discounted payback periods (≤ 0.27 years). The results of risk characterisation of the two mining options show that there is 85% probability that the NPVs of the CMS and CycEx CBCS options will be greater than $2.69 ´ 1010 and $3.42 ´ 1010 respectively. The results of sensitivity analysis show that the input  variables that significantly affect the NPV in both mining options are the discount rate, production rate, oil price, exchange rate, and the federal and provincial tax rates. In general, changes in input parameters such as discount rate, scheduled mine production capacity and time, price of oil per barrel and total operating costs had lower effects on the NPV of the CycEx CBCS option than the CMS option. The calculated economic parameters together with the results of the risk and sensitivity analyses show that the CycEx CBCS option is more economically viable than the CMS option.
油砂开采方案的经济分析
采矿项目通常涉及巨额资本支出,随之而来的是高投资风险。因此,所有新的采矿项目和现有项目都必须进行经济评估,以评估它们的可行性以及它们是否为公司的投资组合增加价值。经济分析是评估和比较不同项目或投资方案的最佳工具之一。各种经济评价标准,如净现值、盈利指数、内部收益率和贴现回收期,通常单独或组合使用,以确定项目的可接受性或吸引力,并帮助从许多选择中选择最佳投资企业。本文对加拿大Syncrude矿的两种油砂开采方案进行了经济、风险和敏感性分析。这些是当前采矿系统(CMS)和循环挖掘机输送带控制系统(CycEx CBCS)。详细的经济分析结果表明,CMS期权的净现值(NPV)为3.20´1010美元,而CycEx CBCS期权的净现值为4.06´1010美元。CMS和CycEx CBCS期权的盈利能力指数分别为19.37和43.37。CMS和CycEx CBCS期权的内部收益率分别为29.02%和33.37%。CMS和CycEx CBCS选项都有非常短的贴现回收期(≤0.27年)。两种采矿期权的风险表征结果显示,CMS和CycEx CBCS期权的npv分别大于2.69´1010美元和3.42´1010美元的概率为85%。敏感性分析结果表明,在两种开采方案中,影响NPV显著的输入变量是贴现率、生产率、油价、汇率以及联邦和省税率。一般来说,诸如贴现率、预定矿山生产能力和时间、每桶石油价格和总运营成本等输入参数的变化对CycEx CBCS选项的NPV的影响低于CMS选项。计算的经济参数以及风险和敏感性分析结果表明,CycEx CBCS方案比CMS方案更具经济可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信