‘I think I’m not a relationship person’: Bisexual women’s accounts of (internalised) binegativity in nonmonogamous relationship narratives

Renate Baumgartner
{"title":"‘I think I’m not a relationship person’: Bisexual women’s accounts of (internalised) binegativity in nonmonogamous relationship narratives","authors":"Renate Baumgartner","doi":"10.53841/bpssex.2017.8.2.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how women (who either had relationships experiences with more than one gender or broadly defined themselves as bisexual) link their non-monogamous relationships with their bisexuality and analyses how these accounts could be argued to reflect these women’s (internalised) binegativity. While binegativity is widely researched, there is a lack of qualitative empirical work on the complexity of bisexual lives in general and of internalised binegativity in particular. This article contributes to these areas of research by drawing on interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to analyse nine qualitative interviews from an ongoing study of bisexual women in Austria. For some of these women, their experiences of non-monogamous relationship forms were linked to (internalised) binegativity, expectations of rejection and concealment of one’s identity; for others, they presented a form of agency. The women showed a range of reactions and strategies related to the positioning of bisexuality and (internalised) binegativity, particularly regarding unfaithfulness: Adoption of binegative self-attributions, excusing the antibisexual notions of others, and engaging in additional emotion work to ensure faithfulness to their partners.","PeriodicalId":91790,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sexualities review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of sexualities review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpssex.2017.8.2.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article explores how women (who either had relationships experiences with more than one gender or broadly defined themselves as bisexual) link their non-monogamous relationships with their bisexuality and analyses how these accounts could be argued to reflect these women’s (internalised) binegativity. While binegativity is widely researched, there is a lack of qualitative empirical work on the complexity of bisexual lives in general and of internalised binegativity in particular. This article contributes to these areas of research by drawing on interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to analyse nine qualitative interviews from an ongoing study of bisexual women in Austria. For some of these women, their experiences of non-monogamous relationship forms were linked to (internalised) binegativity, expectations of rejection and concealment of one’s identity; for others, they presented a form of agency. The women showed a range of reactions and strategies related to the positioning of bisexuality and (internalised) binegativity, particularly regarding unfaithfulness: Adoption of binegative self-attributions, excusing the antibisexual notions of others, and engaging in additional emotion work to ensure faithfulness to their partners.
“我认为我不是一个恋爱的人”:双性恋女性对非一夫一妻制关系叙事(内化)消极的描述
这篇文章探讨了女性(有过不止一种性别的恋爱经历或广泛地将自己定义为双性恋)是如何将她们的非一夫一妻制关系与她们的双性恋联系起来的,并分析了这些描述是如何被认为反映了这些女性(内化的)消极的。虽然负面性被广泛研究,但总体上缺乏对双性恋生活复杂性的定性实证研究,特别是对内化负面性的研究。本文通过利用解释性现象学分析(IPA)来分析奥地利双性恋女性正在进行的研究中的九个定性访谈,从而为这些研究领域做出了贡献。对其中一些妇女来说,她们的非一夫一妻制关系形式的经历与(内化的)消极、被拒绝的预期和隐瞒自己的身份有关;对其他人来说,它们是一种代理形式。这些女性表现出了一系列与双性恋和(内化的)双性恋定位相关的反应和策略,特别是在不忠方面:采用消极的自我归因,为他人的反双性恋概念辩解,以及参与额外的情感工作以确保对伴侣的忠诚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信