The economics of resource-conservation, pollution-reduction technology selection

Ariel Dinar, David Zilberman
{"title":"The economics of resource-conservation, pollution-reduction technology selection","authors":"Ariel Dinar,&nbsp;David Zilberman","doi":"10.1016/0165-0572(91)90002-K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Irrigated agriculture is a major consumer of limited water resources and also a substantial source of pollution. Use of modern irrigation technologies has been proposed as one of several possible solutions to problems of water resource scarcity and environmental pollution in many irrigated agricultural areas. An economic model to assess irrigation technology choice is developed, which expands many of the aspects developed in previous publications, and takes into consideration aspects such as weather conditions and the dual effects of input quality (soil and water). General relationships between variables are derived and tested for cotton and tomatoes under conditions prevailing on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley, California. The results from the empirical model provide the following main conclusions: (1) modern irrigation technologies serve to substantially reduce impacts of quality and weather differences on profitability; (2) the impacts of changing one input quality indicator are not independent of other input-quality indicators; (3) the categorization of technologies as ‘input saving’ or ‘yield increasing’ may be misleading; (4) technology choices are sensitive to product (crop) characteristics, and (5) taxation on pollution increases the likelihood of water conservation, adoption of modern technologies, or transition from one crop to another.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101080,"journal":{"name":"Resources and Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-0572(91)90002-K","citationCount":"73","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016505729190002K","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 73

Abstract

Irrigated agriculture is a major consumer of limited water resources and also a substantial source of pollution. Use of modern irrigation technologies has been proposed as one of several possible solutions to problems of water resource scarcity and environmental pollution in many irrigated agricultural areas. An economic model to assess irrigation technology choice is developed, which expands many of the aspects developed in previous publications, and takes into consideration aspects such as weather conditions and the dual effects of input quality (soil and water). General relationships between variables are derived and tested for cotton and tomatoes under conditions prevailing on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley, California. The results from the empirical model provide the following main conclusions: (1) modern irrigation technologies serve to substantially reduce impacts of quality and weather differences on profitability; (2) the impacts of changing one input quality indicator are not independent of other input-quality indicators; (3) the categorization of technologies as ‘input saving’ or ‘yield increasing’ may be misleading; (4) technology choices are sensitive to product (crop) characteristics, and (5) taxation on pollution increases the likelihood of water conservation, adoption of modern technologies, or transition from one crop to another.

节约资源、减少污染的经济技术选择
灌溉农业是有限水资源的主要消耗者,也是污染的主要来源。利用现代灌溉技术已被提出作为解决许多灌溉区水资源短缺和环境污染问题的几种可能解决方案之一。开发了一个评估灌溉技术选择的经济模型,它扩展了以前出版物中开发的许多方面,并考虑到诸如天气条件和投入质量(土壤和水)的双重影响等方面。在加州圣华金河谷西侧的普遍条件下,推导并测试了棉花和西红柿变量之间的一般关系。实证结果表明:(1)现代灌溉技术显著降低了质量和天气差异对盈利能力的影响;(2)改变某一投入质量指标的影响并非独立于其他投入质量指标;(3)将技术分类为“节省投入”或“提高产量”可能具有误导性;(4)技术选择对产品(作物)特性敏感;(5)对污染征税增加了节水、采用现代技术或从一种作物向另一种作物过渡的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信