The Liberal Cloak: The Constant-De Pradt Controversy on Bolívar’s Last Dictatorship

Q4 Arts and Humanities
José Antonio Aguilar Rivera
{"title":"The Liberal Cloak: The Constant-De Pradt Controversy on Bolívar’s Last Dictatorship","authors":"José Antonio Aguilar Rivera","doi":"10.15460/jbla.55.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the 1830 polemic between Benjamin Constant and the Abbé de Pradt over Simón Bolívar’s last dictatorship. I argue that in the debate a key flaw of liberal constitutionalism was evidenced: the lack of a theory of emergency powers. The new nations of Latin America drafted constitutions following Constant’s ideas regarding emergency provisions. Constant had argued forcibly against broad emergency provisions. While Bolívar was an admirer of Constant, he deviated from his constitutional thinking regarding temporary emergency provisions.","PeriodicalId":52370,"journal":{"name":"Jahrbuch fuer Geschichte Lateinamerikas/Anuario de Historia de Amrica Latina","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jahrbuch fuer Geschichte Lateinamerikas/Anuario de Historia de Amrica Latina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15460/jbla.55.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the 1830 polemic between Benjamin Constant and the Abbé de Pradt over Simón Bolívar’s last dictatorship. I argue that in the debate a key flaw of liberal constitutionalism was evidenced: the lack of a theory of emergency powers. The new nations of Latin America drafted constitutions following Constant’s ideas regarding emergency provisions. Constant had argued forcibly against broad emergency provisions. While Bolívar was an admirer of Constant, he deviated from his constitutional thinking regarding temporary emergency provisions.
自由的外衣:关于Bolívar最后一个独裁政权的康斯坦特-德-普拉特之争
本文考察了1830年本雅明·康斯坦特和修道院院长德·普拉特之间关于Simón Bolívar最后独裁统治的争论。我认为,在这场辩论中,自由宪政主义的一个关键缺陷得到了证明:缺乏紧急权力理论。拉丁美洲的新国家按照康斯坦德关于紧急条款的想法起草了宪法。康斯坦斯曾极力反对广泛的应急规定。虽然Bolívar是康斯坦特的崇拜者,但他偏离了他关于临时紧急规定的宪法思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信