How to certify reference materials: by voting or by exact weights

A. B. Kopiltsova, B. Tarasov, U. A. Kopiltsov
{"title":"How to certify reference materials: by voting or by exact weights","authors":"A. B. Kopiltsova, B. Tarasov, U. A. Kopiltsov","doi":"10.32758/2071-5951-2021-1-4-20-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problems of using reference materials (RM) of oil and petroleum products humidity is discussed for different programs of certification: according to accuracy of the preparation procedure (RM-PP), according to the results of the interlaboratory studies (RM-INTERLAB) and using reference methods (RM-RM). Similar NIST samples (SRM 2271 and 272) were used for comparison. The problem of using CO-INTERLAB for control the accuracy of standard methods is the absence of the true value, this task is not even raised. \"Accuracy control\" has a different emphasis in this situation: RM-INTERLAB allow to select, \"voting by majority\" among the general population of the laboratory and cut the others. Therefore, their main application is qualification tasks. This approach is basically incorrect for analyzers. In the case of RM-PP and RM-RM, the main problem is the difference in the composition of real samples and ideal matrices of RM’s. Their main application is the control the accuracy of the analyzers in the absence of interfering influences. The \"cheap\" RM’s production technologies do not allow the omprehensive control of the real oil samples. The complication of oil technologies and the use of heavy oils in refining could provide the progress in RM’s.","PeriodicalId":23767,"journal":{"name":"World of Oil products the Oil Companies Bulletin","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World of Oil products the Oil Companies Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32758/2071-5951-2021-1-4-20-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problems of using reference materials (RM) of oil and petroleum products humidity is discussed for different programs of certification: according to accuracy of the preparation procedure (RM-PP), according to the results of the interlaboratory studies (RM-INTERLAB) and using reference methods (RM-RM). Similar NIST samples (SRM 2271 and 272) were used for comparison. The problem of using CO-INTERLAB for control the accuracy of standard methods is the absence of the true value, this task is not even raised. "Accuracy control" has a different emphasis in this situation: RM-INTERLAB allow to select, "voting by majority" among the general population of the laboratory and cut the others. Therefore, their main application is qualification tasks. This approach is basically incorrect for analyzers. In the case of RM-PP and RM-RM, the main problem is the difference in the composition of real samples and ideal matrices of RM’s. Their main application is the control the accuracy of the analyzers in the absence of interfering influences. The "cheap" RM’s production technologies do not allow the omprehensive control of the real oil samples. The complication of oil technologies and the use of heavy oils in refining could provide the progress in RM’s.
如何认证参考材料:通过投票还是通过精确的权重
针对不同的认证方案:根据制备程序的准确性(RM- pp),根据实验室间研究的结果(RM- interlab)和使用参考方法(RM-RM),讨论了使用石油和石油产品湿度标准物质(RM)的问题。相似的NIST样本(SRM 2271和272)用于比较。使用CO-INTERLAB来控制标准方法的准确度的问题是没有真实值,这个任务甚至没有被提出。“准确性控制”在这种情况下有不同的重点:RM-INTERLAB允许选择,在实验室的一般人群中“多数投票”,并削减其他人。因此,它们的主要应用是鉴定任务。对于分析器来说,这种方法基本上是不正确的。在RM- pp和RM-RM的情况下,主要问题是RM的实际样本和理想矩阵的组成不同。它们的主要应用是在没有干扰影响的情况下控制分析仪的精度。“廉价”RM的生产技术不允许对真实的油样进行全面控制。炼油技术的复杂性和重油在炼制中的应用为炼油技术的发展提供了动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信