The effect of Open Access on scientometric indicators of Russian economic journals

IF 0.5 Q4 MANAGEMENT
O. Chernova
{"title":"The effect of Open Access on scientometric indicators of Russian economic journals","authors":"O. Chernova","doi":"10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-4-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous publishers view the Open Access (OA) model as one of the ways to strengthen journals’ position. Enhancing the visibility of publications is believed to increase research productivity. The paper explores the impact of OA on scientometric indicators of Russian economic journals. The theoretical basis is comprised of the data management approaches and scientometric management. The methods of scientometrics, bibliometrics and comparative analysis were applied. The paper looks at the main scientometric indicators used in the Science Index ranking: journal impact factor, self-citation rate, authors’ h-index, and the share of downloads. The data for analysis were retrieved from the eLibrary platform. The sample of the study includes open and closed access Russian economic journals from the list of the Higher Attestation Commission (HAC). The results obtained indicate that scientometric indicators of OA journals are higher than those of subscription-based journals, while there are no significant differences between periodicals with paid and free publications. We have found that the OA model does not guarantee an increase in scientometric indicators: most of the titles in the sample are characterised by unstable scientific positions. The research demonstrates the opportunities for using scientometric and bibliometric analyses in the strategic management system of a scientific journal aimed at improving its academic reputation.","PeriodicalId":42955,"journal":{"name":"Upravlenets-The Manager","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upravlenets-The Manager","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-4-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Numerous publishers view the Open Access (OA) model as one of the ways to strengthen journals’ position. Enhancing the visibility of publications is believed to increase research productivity. The paper explores the impact of OA on scientometric indicators of Russian economic journals. The theoretical basis is comprised of the data management approaches and scientometric management. The methods of scientometrics, bibliometrics and comparative analysis were applied. The paper looks at the main scientometric indicators used in the Science Index ranking: journal impact factor, self-citation rate, authors’ h-index, and the share of downloads. The data for analysis were retrieved from the eLibrary platform. The sample of the study includes open and closed access Russian economic journals from the list of the Higher Attestation Commission (HAC). The results obtained indicate that scientometric indicators of OA journals are higher than those of subscription-based journals, while there are no significant differences between periodicals with paid and free publications. We have found that the OA model does not guarantee an increase in scientometric indicators: most of the titles in the sample are characterised by unstable scientific positions. The research demonstrates the opportunities for using scientometric and bibliometric analyses in the strategic management system of a scientific journal aimed at improving its academic reputation.
开放获取对俄罗斯经济期刊科学计量指标的影响
许多出版商将开放获取(OA)模式视为加强期刊地位的途径之一。提高出版物的知名度被认为可以提高研究生产力。本文探讨了开放获取对俄罗斯经济期刊科学计量指标的影响。理论基础包括数据管理方法和科学计量管理。采用科学计量学、文献计量学和比较分析法。本文考察了科学指数排名中使用的主要科学计量指标:期刊影响因子、自引率、作者h指数和下载份额。用于分析的数据是从图书馆平台检索的。该研究的样本包括来自高等认证委员会(HAC)名单的开放和封闭获取的俄罗斯经济期刊。研究结果表明,开放获取期刊的科学计量指标高于订阅期刊,而付费期刊与免费期刊的科学计量指标差异不显著。我们发现OA模型不能保证科学计量指标的增加:样本中的大多数标题都具有不稳定的科学立场。本研究展示了科学计量学和文献计量学分析在旨在提高学术声誉的科学期刊战略管理系统中的应用机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信