Nexus between energy intensity and capital-output ratio: A holistic approach

IF 4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
S. Amin, Farhad Taghizadeh‐Hesary, Foqoruddin Al Kabir, Farhan Khan
{"title":"Nexus between energy intensity and capital-output ratio: A holistic approach","authors":"S. Amin, Farhad Taghizadeh‐Hesary, Foqoruddin Al Kabir, Farhan Khan","doi":"10.1177/0958305X221115489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The incremental capital-output ratio indicates the extent of capital efficiency as firms gradually become technically efficient. Therefore, we aim to empirically assess the linkage between energy intensity and incremental capital-output ratio from a holistic point of view, the first of its kind, by analyzing data from select South Asian countries, lower- and middle-income, and high-income countries. We use standard and robust cross-sectional augmented econometric methodologies for the empirical analysis using data from 1990 to 2018. We reveal unidirectional causation from the incremental capital-output ratio to energy intensity in five South Asian countries and 52 high-income countries. However, bidirectional causality is found between the incremental capital-output ratio and energy intensity for the 34 lower- and middle-income countries. The elasticity of the incremental capital-output ratio to energy intensity for South Asian countries is 0.15 in the long-run. By contrast, the same elasticities for lower- and middle-income and high-income countries are 0.11 and 0.003, respectively. The effect of the incremental capital-output ratio on energy intensity is significantly lower in high-income countries than in the other two groups due to technical inefficiency. Our results are expected to guide the policymakers in developing and emerging economies in adopting optimal policies to achieve efficient and sustainable production and consumption.","PeriodicalId":11652,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"34 1","pages":"2721 - 2739"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221115489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incremental capital-output ratio indicates the extent of capital efficiency as firms gradually become technically efficient. Therefore, we aim to empirically assess the linkage between energy intensity and incremental capital-output ratio from a holistic point of view, the first of its kind, by analyzing data from select South Asian countries, lower- and middle-income, and high-income countries. We use standard and robust cross-sectional augmented econometric methodologies for the empirical analysis using data from 1990 to 2018. We reveal unidirectional causation from the incremental capital-output ratio to energy intensity in five South Asian countries and 52 high-income countries. However, bidirectional causality is found between the incremental capital-output ratio and energy intensity for the 34 lower- and middle-income countries. The elasticity of the incremental capital-output ratio to energy intensity for South Asian countries is 0.15 in the long-run. By contrast, the same elasticities for lower- and middle-income and high-income countries are 0.11 and 0.003, respectively. The effect of the incremental capital-output ratio on energy intensity is significantly lower in high-income countries than in the other two groups due to technical inefficiency. Our results are expected to guide the policymakers in developing and emerging economies in adopting optimal policies to achieve efficient and sustainable production and consumption.
能源强度与资本产出率之间的关系:一个整体的方法
增量资本产出率表明随着企业逐渐提高技术效率,资本效率的程度。因此,我们的目标是通过分析来自选定的南亚国家、中低收入国家和高收入国家的数据,首次从整体角度对能源强度与增量资本产出率之间的联系进行实证评估。我们使用标准和稳健的横截面增强计量经济学方法对1990年至2018年的数据进行实证分析。本文揭示了五个南亚国家和52个高收入国家的增量资本产出率与能源强度之间的单向因果关系。然而,在34个中低收入国家中,发现增量资本产出率与能源强度之间存在双向因果关系。长期来看,南亚国家增量资本产出率与能源强度之比的弹性为0.15。相比之下,低收入、中等收入和高收入国家的相同弹性分别为0.11和0.003。由于技术效率低下,高收入国家的增量资本产出率对能源强度的影响明显低于其他两组。我们的研究结果有望指导发展中国家和新兴经济体的决策者采取最优政策,以实现高效和可持续的生产和消费。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy & Environment
Energy & Environment ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Energy & Environment is an interdisciplinary journal inviting energy policy analysts, natural scientists and engineers, as well as lawyers and economists to contribute to mutual understanding and learning, believing that better communication between experts will enhance the quality of policy, advance social well-being and help to reduce conflict. The journal encourages dialogue between the social sciences as energy demand and supply are observed and analysed with reference to politics of policy-making and implementation. The rapidly evolving social and environmental impacts of energy supply, transport, production and use at all levels require contribution from many disciplines if policy is to be effective. In particular E & E invite contributions from the study of policy delivery, ultimately more important than policy formation. The geopolitics of energy are also important, as are the impacts of environmental regulations and advancing technologies on national and local politics, and even global energy politics. Energy & Environment is a forum for constructive, professional information sharing, as well as debate across disciplines and professions, including the financial sector. Mathematical articles are outside the scope of Energy & Environment. The broader policy implications of submitted research should be addressed and environmental implications, not just emission quantities, be discussed with reference to scientific assumptions. This applies especially to technical papers based on arguments suggested by other disciplines, funding bodies or directly by policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信