The surgical learning curve for salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective single-surgeon study.

Q1 Medicine
X. Bonet, M. Moschovas, F. Onol, K. Bhat, T. Rogers, G. Ogaya‐Pinies, B. Rocco, M. Sighinolfi, T. Woodlief, F. Vigués, V. Patel
{"title":"The surgical learning curve for salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective single-surgeon study.","authors":"X. Bonet, M. Moschovas, F. Onol, K. Bhat, T. Rogers, G. Ogaya‐Pinies, B. Rocco, M. Sighinolfi, T. Woodlief, F. Vigués, V. Patel","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04077-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nTo report the overall results and the learning curve (LC) in salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) patients, in terms of morbidity, oncological and functional outcomes in a single surgeon tertiary-referral center.\n\n\nMETHODS\nOne hundred and twenty patients underwent sRARP by a single surgeon (V.P.) from 2008 to 2018. To assess the trends in the learning experience they were sub-divided in 4 groups of 30 consecutive patients based on date of surgery. The Kaplan- Meier method and regression models were used to identify survival estimations and predictors of potency, continence and biochemical failure (BCF) at 12 months.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAs the learning experience for sRALP increased operative time (OT) was significantly shorter (from 139,5 to 121 min) and the amount of nerve-sparing (NS) undertaken increased (from 46 to 80%). While complications rate remained stable, estimated blood loss (EBL) and radiographic anastomotic leaks (RAL) decreased through the groups (from 124 to 69 ml and 40% to 16,7%, respectively). BCF and continence rates at 12 months after sRARP were similar among groups (23-36% and 36,7-50%, respectively) and chance of potency rates tended to increase (from 3,3% to 16-23%) but was not statistically significant. In a multivariate analysis, predictors for BCF were PSM and GS 8-10. Non-radiation primary treatment was the unique predictor of continence at 12 months after sRARP.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur data may suggest a decreasing trend in terms of OT and EBL through the sRARP learning curve. While morbidity remained stable through the time, radiographic anastomotic leaks trended towards a decline. A higher degree of NS was observed through the groups and there was a slight correlation trend between surgical expertise and potency recovery. PSM and GS 8-10 were predictors of BCF and non-radiation primary treatment predicted a better continence after sRARP.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04077-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

BACKGROUND To report the overall results and the learning curve (LC) in salvage robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (sRARP) patients, in terms of morbidity, oncological and functional outcomes in a single surgeon tertiary-referral center. METHODS One hundred and twenty patients underwent sRARP by a single surgeon (V.P.) from 2008 to 2018. To assess the trends in the learning experience they were sub-divided in 4 groups of 30 consecutive patients based on date of surgery. The Kaplan- Meier method and regression models were used to identify survival estimations and predictors of potency, continence and biochemical failure (BCF) at 12 months. RESULTS As the learning experience for sRALP increased operative time (OT) was significantly shorter (from 139,5 to 121 min) and the amount of nerve-sparing (NS) undertaken increased (from 46 to 80%). While complications rate remained stable, estimated blood loss (EBL) and radiographic anastomotic leaks (RAL) decreased through the groups (from 124 to 69 ml and 40% to 16,7%, respectively). BCF and continence rates at 12 months after sRARP were similar among groups (23-36% and 36,7-50%, respectively) and chance of potency rates tended to increase (from 3,3% to 16-23%) but was not statistically significant. In a multivariate analysis, predictors for BCF were PSM and GS 8-10. Non-radiation primary treatment was the unique predictor of continence at 12 months after sRARP. CONCLUSIONS Our data may suggest a decreasing trend in terms of OT and EBL through the sRARP learning curve. While morbidity remained stable through the time, radiographic anastomotic leaks trended towards a decline. A higher degree of NS was observed through the groups and there was a slight correlation trend between surgical expertise and potency recovery. PSM and GS 8-10 were predictors of BCF and non-radiation primary treatment predicted a better continence after sRARP.
补救性机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的手术学习曲线:一项前瞻性单外科医生研究。
背景:报告在单个外科医生三级转诊中心中,机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(sRARP)患者在发病率、肿瘤和功能预后方面的总体结果和学习曲线(LC)。方法2008年至2018年,120例患者由一名外科医生(vp)实施sRARP。为了评估学习经验的趋势,他们根据手术日期被细分为4组,每组30名患者。Kaplan- Meier方法和回归模型用于确定12个月时的生存估计和药物效价、尿失禁和生化失败(BCF)的预测因子。结果随着sRALP学习经验的增加,手术时间(OT)明显缩短(从139,5 min减少到121 min),神经保留量(NS)增加(从46%增加到80%)。虽然并发症发生率保持稳定,但各组估计失血量(EBL)和x线吻合口漏(RAL)分别从124 ml减少到69 ml和40%减少到16.7%。各组间sRARP后12个月的BCF和失禁率相似(分别为23-36%和36.7 -50%),有效率的机会有增加的趋势(从3.3%增加到16-23%),但无统计学意义。在多变量分析中,BCF的预测因子是PSM和GS 8-10。非放射治疗是sRARP后12个月尿失禁的唯一预测因子。结论通过sRARP学习曲线,我们的数据可能提示OT和EBL有下降趋势。虽然发病率一直保持稳定,但x线摄影吻合口泄漏呈下降趋势。两组患者NS程度均较高,手术技能与效力恢复有轻微的相关趋势。PSM和GS 8-10是BCF的预测指标,非放射治疗可预测sRARP术后更好的尿失禁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信