A comparative study on different singularity extraction techniques of EFIE

Chunbei Luo, Yong Zhang, Hai Lin
{"title":"A comparative study on different singularity extraction techniques of EFIE","authors":"Chunbei Luo, Yong Zhang, Hai Lin","doi":"10.1109/COMPEM.2015.7052665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparative study on different singularity extraction techniques of Electric Field Integral Equation (EFIE) is presented Three types of methods which are the Duffy transform, projection integration and the analytic integration are implemented and compared Numerical results show the differences in the efficiency, memory usage and the accuracy of three methods. Furthermore, the best choice of the different methods is recommended for dealing with singularity when mesh sizes are different.","PeriodicalId":6530,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Electromagnetics","volume":"37 1","pages":"369-370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Computational Electromagnetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPEM.2015.7052665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comparative study on different singularity extraction techniques of Electric Field Integral Equation (EFIE) is presented Three types of methods which are the Duffy transform, projection integration and the analytic integration are implemented and compared Numerical results show the differences in the efficiency, memory usage and the accuracy of three methods. Furthermore, the best choice of the different methods is recommended for dealing with singularity when mesh sizes are different.
不同奇异点提取技术的比较研究
对电场积分方程(EFIE)奇异点提取方法进行了比较研究,分别对Duffy变换、投影积分和解析积分三种方法进行了比较。数值结果表明,三种方法在效率、内存占用和精度方面存在差异。在网格尺寸不同的情况下,给出了不同奇异点处理方法的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信