Management disruptions and business growth of public and private sector enterprise in delta state, nigeria

Q3 Decision Sciences
Ogor Tessy Morka, Ifeanyi Harold Aliku
{"title":"Management disruptions and business growth of public and private sector enterprise in delta state, nigeria","authors":"Ogor Tessy Morka, Ifeanyi Harold Aliku","doi":"10.26524/jms.12.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of the study was to compare management disruptions and business growth in both public and private sector enterprises. It involved four public sectors and four private sector enterprises, which comprised 221 respondents from staff and management of the enterprises as the sample size for the study. A stratified sampling technique was adopted for the study. Validated structured questionnaires were used for data collection. The statistical techniques adopted for processing the data and testing the hypotheses for this study were comparing mean using independent samples t-test via the use of statistical package for social science (SPSS) software version 21. Descriptive statistics and frequency analysis was used to explain the tables of the various variables. The mean response was tested using a student t-test. The findings of the study revealed that personal values which is the first variable revealed that there is no significant difference in ethical leadership and business growth between the Public and Private enterprises (Sig = .728, P>0.05). Similarly, Social values which is the second variable showed that there is no significant difference in management disruptions and business growth between the Public and Privateenterprises (Sig =.238, P>0.05). Moral values which is the third variable showed that there is also no significant difference in management disruptions and business growth between the Public and Private enterprises (Sig =.007,P>0.05). The study concluded that the leadership of the public and private enterprise should have the ethical values, interpersonal qualities and capabilities to carry out the different tasks as needed by the organizations. Hence, the study recommended that the efforts in promoting management disruptions practices in public and private enterprises must start and be perceptible at the top of the organization.","PeriodicalId":37730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Information and Decision Science","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Information and Decision Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26524/jms.12.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of the study was to compare management disruptions and business growth in both public and private sector enterprises. It involved four public sectors and four private sector enterprises, which comprised 221 respondents from staff and management of the enterprises as the sample size for the study. A stratified sampling technique was adopted for the study. Validated structured questionnaires were used for data collection. The statistical techniques adopted for processing the data and testing the hypotheses for this study were comparing mean using independent samples t-test via the use of statistical package for social science (SPSS) software version 21. Descriptive statistics and frequency analysis was used to explain the tables of the various variables. The mean response was tested using a student t-test. The findings of the study revealed that personal values which is the first variable revealed that there is no significant difference in ethical leadership and business growth between the Public and Private enterprises (Sig = .728, P>0.05). Similarly, Social values which is the second variable showed that there is no significant difference in management disruptions and business growth between the Public and Privateenterprises (Sig =.238, P>0.05). Moral values which is the third variable showed that there is also no significant difference in management disruptions and business growth between the Public and Private enterprises (Sig =.007,P>0.05). The study concluded that the leadership of the public and private enterprise should have the ethical values, interpersonal qualities and capabilities to carry out the different tasks as needed by the organizations. Hence, the study recommended that the efforts in promoting management disruptions practices in public and private enterprises must start and be perceptible at the top of the organization.
尼日利亚三角洲州公共和私营部门企业的管理中断和业务增长
这项研究的主要目的是比较公共和私营部门企业的管理中断和业务增长。调查涉及四个公营机构和四个私营机构企业,共有221名受访企业的员工和管理层,作为研究的样本。本研究采用分层抽样方法。数据收集采用经过验证的结构化问卷。本研究采用的数据处理和假设检验的统计技术是通过使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)软件版本21,使用独立样本t检验比较平均值。采用描述性统计和频率分析对各变量表进行解释。平均反应用学生t检验进行检验。研究结果显示,个人价值观作为第一个变量,在伦理领导和企业成长方面,公、民营企业之间没有显著差异(Sig = .728, P>0.05)。同样,作为第二个变量的社会价值观表明,公共企业和私营企业在管理中断和业务增长方面没有显著差异(Sig =)。238年,P > 0.05)。道德价值观是第三个变量,表明公私企业在管理中断和业务增长方面也没有显著差异(Sig =.007,P>0.05)。该研究的结论是,公共和私营企业的领导应该具有道德价值观、人际交往素质和能力,以执行组织所需的不同任务。因此,该研究建议,在公共和私营企业中促进管理中断做法的努力必须从组织的高层开始并得到察觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Management Information and Decision Science
Journal of Management Information and Decision Science Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences (JMIDS) is a reputed open access journal affiliated to Allied Business Academies. The journal focuses on disseminating the latest research in the field of management information system and its role in decision making, as well their relationships to cognate disciplines including Economics, Finance, Management, Management Science, Marketing, Statistics, Operations Research and Engineering. The journal adheres to stringent double blind peer review policy to maintain the publication quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信