The Impact of Variant Local Involvement in Community Based Ecotourism: A Conceptual Framework Approach

Israel Petros Menbere, Kassahun Abie, Hadis Tadele, Getahun Gebru
{"title":"The Impact of Variant Local Involvement in Community Based Ecotourism: A Conceptual Framework Approach","authors":"Israel Petros Menbere, Kassahun Abie, Hadis Tadele, Getahun Gebru","doi":"10.4172/2157-7625.1000261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to determine the impact of variant local involvement in ecotourism and associated strengths and weaknesses of the Adaba-Dodola community based ecotourism project, in South Ethiopia. Households from CBECT program and non-program communities, focus groups of CBECT participants and nonparticipants, and key-informants from culture and tourism office and from Oromia forest and wildlife enterprise were the target respondents. The primary data were collected through questionnaires, interviews and focused group discussions. Document reviews were also made to support the study. The quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive statistics while the qualitative data were analyzed in the form of narrations. The result of the study indicated that participants were highly benefited compared to nonparticipants due to the different level of participation and ways of involvement in ecotourism activities. Participants were benefited economically while nonparticipants enjoyed benefits associated with natural services. This led to positive perception to exist in participants than nonparticipants. As a result, the perception of communities towards ecotourism had been impacted by the difference of ecotourism support in the livelihood of participant and nonparticipant communities. In relation to this, working with community and promoting experience sharing for communities were the main strengths of ecotourism program according to participants while majority of nonparticipants stated as there were no major strengths to the ecotourism project. Subsequently, both groups identified insufficient implementation of the CBECT program as the main weakness of ecotourism in the area.","PeriodicalId":15637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7625.1000261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the impact of variant local involvement in ecotourism and associated strengths and weaknesses of the Adaba-Dodola community based ecotourism project, in South Ethiopia. Households from CBECT program and non-program communities, focus groups of CBECT participants and nonparticipants, and key-informants from culture and tourism office and from Oromia forest and wildlife enterprise were the target respondents. The primary data were collected through questionnaires, interviews and focused group discussions. Document reviews were also made to support the study. The quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive statistics while the qualitative data were analyzed in the form of narrations. The result of the study indicated that participants were highly benefited compared to nonparticipants due to the different level of participation and ways of involvement in ecotourism activities. Participants were benefited economically while nonparticipants enjoyed benefits associated with natural services. This led to positive perception to exist in participants than nonparticipants. As a result, the perception of communities towards ecotourism had been impacted by the difference of ecotourism support in the livelihood of participant and nonparticipant communities. In relation to this, working with community and promoting experience sharing for communities were the main strengths of ecotourism program according to participants while majority of nonparticipants stated as there were no major strengths to the ecotourism project. Subsequently, both groups identified insufficient implementation of the CBECT program as the main weakness of ecotourism in the area.
基于社区的生态旅游中不同地方参与的影响:一个概念框架方法
本研究旨在确定埃塞俄比亚南部以Adaba-Dodola社区为基础的生态旅游项目的不同地方参与对生态旅游的影响以及相关的优势和劣势。来自CBECT项目和非项目社区的家庭、CBECT参与者和非参与者的焦点小组、文化和旅游办公室和奥罗米亚森林和野生动物企业的关键线人是目标调查对象。主要数据通过问卷调查、访谈和焦点小组讨论收集。还进行了文件审查以支持这项研究。定量数据采用描述性统计进行分析,定性数据采用叙述形式进行分析。研究结果表明,由于参与程度和参与方式的不同,参与者比非参与者受益更大。参与者在经济上受益,而非参与者则享受与自然服务相关的利益。这导致参与者比非参与者存在积极的感知。结果表明,生态旅游参与社区和非生态旅游参与社区在生计方面的支持程度差异影响了社区对生态旅游的认知。与此相关,参与者认为与社区合作和促进社区经验分享是生态旅游项目的主要优势,而大多数非参与者认为生态旅游项目没有主要优势。随后,两个小组都认为CBECT计划的实施不足是该地区生态旅游的主要弱点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信