Measuring impacts and risks to the public of a privately operated toll road project by considering perspectives in cost-benefit analysis

Sae Chi, J. Bunker, Melissa Teo
{"title":"Measuring impacts and risks to the public of a privately operated toll road project by considering perspectives in cost-benefit analysis","authors":"Sae Chi, J. Bunker, Melissa Teo","doi":"10.1061/JTEPBS.0000088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision making about transport infrastructure investment is based on the net impacts and risks to the community. The private sector is often involved in toll road projects, including various schemes to design, build, operate and/or finance the project either in a partnership with a host government, independently, or in some combination. Cost-Benefit Analysis of a privately operated toll road require careful allocations of project impacts, in order to properly reflect the net impacts and risks to the community from the host government’s perspective. This study investigates whether alternative assumptions are valid from differing perspectives, when toll roads are delivered and operated privately rather than by a host government. Treatments of tolls and other toll road project related payments are considered from different perspectives. Cost-Benefit Analysis is conducted for a synthesised toll tunnel project case by considering alternating treatments of some impacts. This leads to the exploration of analyses outcomes when the treatment of tolls differ when two perspectives of “toll as a transfer payment” and “toll as an end user cost” are considered. Various scenarios are explored including public versus private operations. The Monte Carlo simulation approach is used to account the risks of variables in the analysis. The synthesised case study revealed that, for privately operated toll roads, treating toll charges as a transfer payment, and alternatively as an end user cost, can both be valid approaches but from two perspectives. Moreover, the analysis outcomes under different perspectives are particularly helpful to make decisions on the basis of the impacts and risks solely from the perspective of the host government. The proposed methodology can examine various scenarios other than the ones examined in this study and is extremely useful in the project evaluation of privately operated toll road projects.","PeriodicalId":21486,"journal":{"name":"Science & Engineering Faculty","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Engineering Faculty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Decision making about transport infrastructure investment is based on the net impacts and risks to the community. The private sector is often involved in toll road projects, including various schemes to design, build, operate and/or finance the project either in a partnership with a host government, independently, or in some combination. Cost-Benefit Analysis of a privately operated toll road require careful allocations of project impacts, in order to properly reflect the net impacts and risks to the community from the host government’s perspective. This study investigates whether alternative assumptions are valid from differing perspectives, when toll roads are delivered and operated privately rather than by a host government. Treatments of tolls and other toll road project related payments are considered from different perspectives. Cost-Benefit Analysis is conducted for a synthesised toll tunnel project case by considering alternating treatments of some impacts. This leads to the exploration of analyses outcomes when the treatment of tolls differ when two perspectives of “toll as a transfer payment” and “toll as an end user cost” are considered. Various scenarios are explored including public versus private operations. The Monte Carlo simulation approach is used to account the risks of variables in the analysis. The synthesised case study revealed that, for privately operated toll roads, treating toll charges as a transfer payment, and alternatively as an end user cost, can both be valid approaches but from two perspectives. Moreover, the analysis outcomes under different perspectives are particularly helpful to make decisions on the basis of the impacts and risks solely from the perspective of the host government. The proposed methodology can examine various scenarios other than the ones examined in this study and is extremely useful in the project evaluation of privately operated toll road projects.
通过考虑成本效益分析的角度来衡量私营收费公路项目对公众的影响和风险
交通基础设施投资的决策是基于对社区的净影响和风险。私营部门经常参与收费公路项目,包括与东道国政府合作、独立或以某种组合方式设计、建造、运营和/或融资项目的各种方案。对私营收费公路进行成本效益分析,需要仔细分配项目影响,以便从东道国政府的角度正确反映对社区的净影响和风险。本研究从不同的角度调查了当收费公路由私人而不是由东道国政府交付和运营时,其他假设是否有效。从不同的角度考虑过路费和其他收费公路项目相关付款的处理。以综合收费隧道工程为例,考虑对某些影响的交替处理,进行成本效益分析。当考虑“作为转移支付的通行费”和“作为最终用户成本的通行费”两种观点时,通行费的处理方式不同,这导致了对分析结果的探索。探讨了各种场景,包括公共与私人运营。蒙特卡罗模拟方法用于考虑分析中变量的风险。综合案例研究表明,对于私人运营的收费公路,将收费作为转移支付,或者作为最终用户成本,都可以是有效的方法,但从两个角度来看。此外,不同视角下的分析结果对仅从东道国政府角度考虑影响和风险的决策特别有帮助。建议的方法可以检验除本研究之外的各种情况,在评估私营收费公路项目时非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信