Knowledge Gaps and Research Priorities in Living Shorelines Science: Insights from Stakeholder Interviews Throughout the U.S. Pacific Coast

Marjorie E. Mednikova, C. Whitcraft, D. Zacherl, K. Nichols
{"title":"Knowledge Gaps and Research Priorities in Living Shorelines Science: Insights from Stakeholder Interviews Throughout the U.S. Pacific Coast","authors":"Marjorie E. Mednikova, C. Whitcraft, D. Zacherl, K. Nichols","doi":"10.3160/0038-3872-122.1.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Living shorelines provide a nature-based strategy for coastal restoration with ample opportunity for community engagement and collaboration with interdisciplinary stakeholders. While their implementation has increased over the past few decades, restoration via this technique is limited by several factors including a lack of data sharing among projects and geographical regions, a shortage of long-term monitoring to demonstrate efficacy at meeting project goals, and a need for greater interdisciplinary communication moving forward. In this study, we reviewed recent literature from a range of living shorelines studies throughout the United States and conducted interviews with nature-based coastal restoration practitioners primarily from the U.S. west coast. The insight from these stakeholder interviews allowed us to identify major knowledge gaps about living shorelines and establish priorities for future research and funding, including: (1) funding demonstration projects in their early research stages, (2) supporting projects and trainings for engineers utilizing nature-based infrastructure, (3) conducting long-term monitoring of both ecological and structural properties, (4) communicating findings, importance, and project visualizations to stakeholders within and between communities, and (5) advancing the causes of environmental justice and equity. By reviewing recent literature and engaging with living shoreline practitioners to gather their experiences and suggestions, we have increased understanding of how living shoreline restoration can be more effectively planned, constructed, and monitored at scale, in varied locations and using a range of techniques.","PeriodicalId":90803,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin (Southern California Academy of Sciences)","volume":"27 1","pages":"33 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin (Southern California Academy of Sciences)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3160/0038-3872-122.1.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Living shorelines provide a nature-based strategy for coastal restoration with ample opportunity for community engagement and collaboration with interdisciplinary stakeholders. While their implementation has increased over the past few decades, restoration via this technique is limited by several factors including a lack of data sharing among projects and geographical regions, a shortage of long-term monitoring to demonstrate efficacy at meeting project goals, and a need for greater interdisciplinary communication moving forward. In this study, we reviewed recent literature from a range of living shorelines studies throughout the United States and conducted interviews with nature-based coastal restoration practitioners primarily from the U.S. west coast. The insight from these stakeholder interviews allowed us to identify major knowledge gaps about living shorelines and establish priorities for future research and funding, including: (1) funding demonstration projects in their early research stages, (2) supporting projects and trainings for engineers utilizing nature-based infrastructure, (3) conducting long-term monitoring of both ecological and structural properties, (4) communicating findings, importance, and project visualizations to stakeholders within and between communities, and (5) advancing the causes of environmental justice and equity. By reviewing recent literature and engaging with living shoreline practitioners to gather their experiences and suggestions, we have increased understanding of how living shoreline restoration can be more effectively planned, constructed, and monitored at scale, in varied locations and using a range of techniques.
生活海岸线科学中的知识差距和研究重点:来自美国太平洋沿岸利益相关者访谈的见解
摘要有生命的海岸线为海岸恢复提供了一种基于自然的策略,为社区参与和跨学科利益相关者的合作提供了充足的机会。虽然在过去的几十年里,它们的实施有所增加,但通过这种技术进行的恢复受到几个因素的限制,包括缺乏项目和地理区域之间的数据共享,缺乏长期监测来证明项目目标的有效性,以及需要更多的跨学科沟通。在这项研究中,我们回顾了来自美国各地的一系列活海岸线研究的最新文献,并对主要来自美国西海岸的基于自然的海岸恢复从业者进行了采访。从这些利益相关者访谈中获得的见解使我们能够确定关于生命海岸线的主要知识差距,并确定未来研究和资助的优先事项,包括:(1)为早期研究阶段的示范项目提供资金;(2)支持利用自然基础设施的项目和工程师培训;(3)对生态和结构特性进行长期监测;(4)向社区内部和社区之间的利益相关者传达研究结果、重要性和项目可视化;(5)推进环境正义和公平的事业。通过回顾最近的文献,并与活海岸线实践者接触,收集他们的经验和建议,我们增加了对如何更有效地规划、建造和监测活海岸线恢复的理解,在规模上,在不同的地点,并使用一系列技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信