The quality of voice and speech before and after surgical treatment of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis

M. Bogdan, R. Jović, Tanja Arbutina
{"title":"The quality of voice and speech before and after surgical treatment of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis","authors":"M. Bogdan, R. Jović, Tanja Arbutina","doi":"10.2298/MPNS1706146B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"nerve paralysis. Material and Methods. The study included 16 patients with bilateral vocal cord paralysis and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The patients underwent partial arytenoid ectomy with posterior cordectomy at the Clinical Center of Vojvo-dina in the period from January to April 2014. The quality of voice and speech was determined before and after surgical treatment by subjective, objective, aerodynamic voice analysis, and analysis of spontaneous speech, and then compared to the control group. Results. The results of this study showed that in patients with bilateral vocal cord paralysis the voice and speech quality was significantly worse compared to the healthy subjects. The results of subjective and aerodynamic analysis showed that there was a statistically significant deterioration in voice quality after the surgical treatment (p<0.05; p=0.001). The values of objective analysis and analysis of spontaneous speech parameters did not significantly change after the surgery (p>0.05; p=0.401). Conclusion. The patients with bilat eral vocal cord paralysis have a poorer voice and speech quality compared to the healthy subjects. After the surgical treatment, pa tients presented with a lower voice quality, but there were no sig nificant changes regarding the ability of spontaneous speech.","PeriodicalId":18511,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski pregled","volume":"36 1","pages":"146-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski pregled","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/MPNS1706146B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

nerve paralysis. Material and Methods. The study included 16 patients with bilateral vocal cord paralysis and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The patients underwent partial arytenoid ectomy with posterior cordectomy at the Clinical Center of Vojvo-dina in the period from January to April 2014. The quality of voice and speech was determined before and after surgical treatment by subjective, objective, aerodynamic voice analysis, and analysis of spontaneous speech, and then compared to the control group. Results. The results of this study showed that in patients with bilateral vocal cord paralysis the voice and speech quality was significantly worse compared to the healthy subjects. The results of subjective and aerodynamic analysis showed that there was a statistically significant deterioration in voice quality after the surgical treatment (p<0.05; p=0.001). The values of objective analysis and analysis of spontaneous speech parameters did not significantly change after the surgery (p>0.05; p=0.401). Conclusion. The patients with bilat eral vocal cord paralysis have a poorer voice and speech quality compared to the healthy subjects. After the surgical treatment, pa tients presented with a lower voice quality, but there were no sig nificant changes regarding the ability of spontaneous speech.
双侧喉返神经麻痹手术治疗前后的语音及言语质量
神经麻痹。材料和方法。该研究包括16名双侧声带麻痹患者和16名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照。患者于2014年1 - 4月在伏伊伏丁那省临床中心行部分杓骨切除术及后核切除术。通过主观、客观、气动语音分析、自发语音分析等方法确定手术前后的语音、言语质量,并与对照组进行比较。结果。本研究结果表明,双侧声带麻痹患者的语音和言语质量明显差于健康人。主观分析和气动分析结果显示,手术治疗后语音质量下降有统计学意义(p0.05;p = 0.401)。结论。双侧声带麻痹患者的语音和言语质量较正常人差。手术治疗后,患者语音质量下降,但自发言语能力无明显变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信