Comparative clinical and radiographical evaluation of success of pulpotomy using biodentine and prf-biodentine combination: an in-vivo study

Thimmanagowda N Patil, P. Saraf, Raghavendra Penukonda, Sneha S. Vanaki
{"title":"Comparative clinical and radiographical evaluation of success of pulpotomy using biodentine and prf-biodentine combination: an in-vivo study","authors":"Thimmanagowda N Patil, P. Saraf, Raghavendra Penukonda, Sneha S. Vanaki","doi":"10.24327/IJRSR.2017.0805.0222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Removal of infected pulp tissue from the coronal portion leads to preservation of a remaining vital and functioning pulp. Preservation of pulp vitality by pulpotomy is one of the universally accepted treatment procedure with the aid of latest bioactive materials leading to a more conservative approach in the management of teeth involving the pulp based on clinical conditions. Aim: To comparatively evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of single visit pulpotomy procedure using Biodentine and the combination of Plasma Rich Fibrin (PRF) and Biodentine Materials and Methods: Twenty permanent molars were selected and randomly assigned to two groups that included pulpotomy with only Biodentine and the other group with the PRF-Biodentine combination. Single visit pulpotomy procedure was completed with the restoration. Later the patients were recalled after one day, three months and six months for clinical and radiographical evaluation. Results: Chi-square test was used to compare the responses for various study variables between Biodentine and PRF-Biodentine combination. The comparison between the two groups was statistically not significant. Conclusion: Single visit pulpotomy procedure performed with either Biodentine or Combined PRF and Biodentine was equally efficient at 6 months follow-up. But with PRF-Biodentine combination, PRF an ideal biomaterial which is autologous can help better than Biodentine alone in the success of vital pulp therapy","PeriodicalId":14198,"journal":{"name":"International journal of recent scientific research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of recent scientific research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24327/IJRSR.2017.0805.0222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Removal of infected pulp tissue from the coronal portion leads to preservation of a remaining vital and functioning pulp. Preservation of pulp vitality by pulpotomy is one of the universally accepted treatment procedure with the aid of latest bioactive materials leading to a more conservative approach in the management of teeth involving the pulp based on clinical conditions. Aim: To comparatively evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of single visit pulpotomy procedure using Biodentine and the combination of Plasma Rich Fibrin (PRF) and Biodentine Materials and Methods: Twenty permanent molars were selected and randomly assigned to two groups that included pulpotomy with only Biodentine and the other group with the PRF-Biodentine combination. Single visit pulpotomy procedure was completed with the restoration. Later the patients were recalled after one day, three months and six months for clinical and radiographical evaluation. Results: Chi-square test was used to compare the responses for various study variables between Biodentine and PRF-Biodentine combination. The comparison between the two groups was statistically not significant. Conclusion: Single visit pulpotomy procedure performed with either Biodentine or Combined PRF and Biodentine was equally efficient at 6 months follow-up. But with PRF-Biodentine combination, PRF an ideal biomaterial which is autologous can help better than Biodentine alone in the success of vital pulp therapy
一项体内研究:生物牙妥定和原生物牙妥定联合应用椎体切开术成功的临床和影像学评价
导言:从冠状部分切除受感染的牙髓组织可以保留剩余的重要和功能的牙髓。在最新生物活性材料的帮助下,通过截髓术来保持牙髓活力是一种普遍接受的治疗方法,这使得根据临床情况对涉及牙髓的牙齿进行更保守的治疗。目的:比较评价富血浆纤维蛋白(PRF)与富血浆纤维蛋白(PRF)与富血浆纤维蛋白(PRF)与富血浆纤维蛋白(PRF)与富血浆纤维蛋白(PRF)与富血浆纤维蛋白(PRF)与富血浆纤维蛋白(PRF)与富血浆纤维蛋白(PRF)联合进行单次牙髓切开术的临床及放射学效果。修复后完成单次牙髓切开术。术后1天、3个月和6个月患者被召回进行临床和影像学评估。结果:采用卡方检验比较百奥汀与prf -百奥汀联合用药对各研究变量的反应。两组比较无统计学意义。结论:在6个月的随访中,使用百妥汀或联合PRF和百妥汀进行单次牙髓瘤切开术的效果相同。而PRF与Biodentine联合使用,PRF是一种理想的自体生物材料,在牙髓治疗中比单独使用Biodentine更有优势
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信