Evaluating social network extraction for classic and modern fiction literature

Niels Dekker, Tobias Kuhn, M. Erp
{"title":"Evaluating social network extraction for classic and modern fiction literature","authors":"Niels Dekker, Tobias Kuhn, M. Erp","doi":"10.7287/PEERJ.PREPRINTS.27263V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of literary works has experienced a surge in computer-assisted processing. To obtain insights into the community structures and social interactions portrayed in novels the creation of social networks from novels has gained popularity. Many methods rely on identifying named entities and relations for the construction of these networks, but many of these tools are not specifically created for the literary domain. Furthermore, many of the studies on information extraction from literature typically focus on 19th century source material. Because of this, it is unclear if these techniques are as suitable to modern-day science fiction and fantasy literature as they are to those 19th century classics. We present a study to compare classic literature to modern literature in terms of performance of natural language processing tools for the automatic extraction of social networks as well as their network structure. We find that there are no significant differences between the two sets of novels but that both are subject to a high amount of variance. Furthermore, we identify several issues that complicate named entity recognition in modern novels and we present methods to remedy these.","PeriodicalId":93040,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ preprints","volume":"45 1","pages":"e27263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ preprints","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7287/PEERJ.PREPRINTS.27263V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The analysis of literary works has experienced a surge in computer-assisted processing. To obtain insights into the community structures and social interactions portrayed in novels the creation of social networks from novels has gained popularity. Many methods rely on identifying named entities and relations for the construction of these networks, but many of these tools are not specifically created for the literary domain. Furthermore, many of the studies on information extraction from literature typically focus on 19th century source material. Because of this, it is unclear if these techniques are as suitable to modern-day science fiction and fantasy literature as they are to those 19th century classics. We present a study to compare classic literature to modern literature in terms of performance of natural language processing tools for the automatic extraction of social networks as well as their network structure. We find that there are no significant differences between the two sets of novels but that both are subject to a high amount of variance. Furthermore, we identify several issues that complicate named entity recognition in modern novels and we present methods to remedy these.
经典与现代小说文学的社会网络提取评价
对文学作品的分析经历了计算机辅助处理的激增。为了深入了解小说中所描绘的社区结构和社会互动,从小说中创建社会网络已经得到了普及。许多方法依赖于识别命名实体和关系来构建这些网络,但是许多这些工具并不是专门为文学领域创建的。此外,许多关于从文学中提取信息的研究通常集中在19世纪的原始材料上。正因为如此,目前还不清楚这些技巧是否适用于现代科幻小说和幻想文学,就像适用于19世纪的经典一样。我们提出了一项比较经典文学和现代文学在自然语言处理工具的性能方面的研究,用于自动提取社会网络及其网络结构。我们发现两套小说之间没有显著差异,但两者都存在很大的差异。此外,我们确定了现代小说中使命名实体识别复杂化的几个问题,并提出了补救这些问题的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信