Vertebrate wildlife incidents with pesticides: a european survey

G. D. Snoo, Nathalie M I Scheidegger, F. Jong
{"title":"Vertebrate wildlife incidents with pesticides: a european survey","authors":"G. D. Snoo, Nathalie M I Scheidegger, F. Jong","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199901)55:1<47::AID-PS859>3.0.CO;2-#","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A survey was carried out to investigate terrestrial wildlife incidents with pesticides in 18 European countries over the period 1990-1994. Only in seven countries does a systematic incident registration system exist. Compared with the other countries, relatively high numbers of incidents were registered in France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Over 1000 incidents were investigated to establish their causes: approved use, misuse or deliberate abuse, and the compounds, species and mode of application involved. It was found that most registered incidents are due to deliberate abuse. Approved use is responsible for only a minor fraction of the incidents, and these are due to particular practices such as use of treated seed, bait or wood preservatives and the spraying of grassland. Hardly any incidents were due to crop-spraying. The reason why so few incidents are registered for normal crop-spraying is discussed: do they not occur, or are the casualties not registered? It is doubtful whether incident registration is a reliable instrument for obtaining a proper understanding of the occurrence of the side-effects of agricultural pesticide use.","PeriodicalId":19985,"journal":{"name":"Pesticide Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"47-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesticide Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199901)55:1<47::AID-PS859>3.0.CO;2-#","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

A survey was carried out to investigate terrestrial wildlife incidents with pesticides in 18 European countries over the period 1990-1994. Only in seven countries does a systematic incident registration system exist. Compared with the other countries, relatively high numbers of incidents were registered in France, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Over 1000 incidents were investigated to establish their causes: approved use, misuse or deliberate abuse, and the compounds, species and mode of application involved. It was found that most registered incidents are due to deliberate abuse. Approved use is responsible for only a minor fraction of the incidents, and these are due to particular practices such as use of treated seed, bait or wood preservatives and the spraying of grassland. Hardly any incidents were due to crop-spraying. The reason why so few incidents are registered for normal crop-spraying is discussed: do they not occur, or are the casualties not registered? It is doubtful whether incident registration is a reliable instrument for obtaining a proper understanding of the occurrence of the side-effects of agricultural pesticide use.
与杀虫剂有关的脊椎动物野生动物事件:一项欧洲调查
在1990-1994年期间,对18个欧洲国家的陆生野生动物杀虫剂事件进行了调查。只有7个国家有系统的事故登记制度。与其他国家相比,法国、荷兰和英国登记的事件数量相对较高。调查了1000多起事件,以确定其原因:批准使用、误用或故意滥用,以及所涉及的化合物、种类和应用方式。调查发现,大多数已登记的事件都是蓄意虐待造成的。经批准的使用仅占事故的一小部分,这些事故是由于使用处理过的种子、诱饵或木材防腐剂以及草地喷洒等特殊做法造成的。几乎没有任何事故是由于喷洒农作物造成的。讨论了为什么很少有事件被登记为正常的作物喷洒:它们没有发生,或者伤亡没有登记?值得怀疑的是,事件登记是否是一种可靠的工具,可以正确地了解农药使用副作用的发生情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信