From devotion to commitment: Towards a critical ontology of engagement

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
Andrea Perunovic
{"title":"From devotion to commitment: Towards a critical ontology of engagement","authors":"Andrea Perunovic","doi":"10.2298/fid2102261p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article approaches the notion of engagement from the perspective of\n critical ontology. With language as the starting point of its hermeneutic\n task, it commences with an etymological analyses of diverse Indo-European\n words gravitating around the semantic field of the notion of engagement.\n From these introductory insights obtained by an exercise in comparative\n linguistics, devotion and commitment are mapped as two opposite, yet\n inseparable, modes of being of engagement. Both of these modes seem to\n condition engagement in an ontologically disparate manner. While examining\n their fundamental structures, some of the canonical concepts of history of\n philosophy such as being, existence, subjectivity, or world - and also some\n of its constitutive binary oppositions such as body/mind,\n individual/collective, transcendence/immanence, light/darkness and\n sacred/secular - will be reconsidered through the prism of different\n ontological dispositions that devotion and commitment impose respectively on\n engagement. The overall aim of this investigation is to bring forth the main\n existential characteristics of being-engaged, by interpreting the roles of\n who, where, and what of engagement, and in order to provide a fundamental\n conceptual apparatus for a critical ontology of engagement.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2102261p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article approaches the notion of engagement from the perspective of critical ontology. With language as the starting point of its hermeneutic task, it commences with an etymological analyses of diverse Indo-European words gravitating around the semantic field of the notion of engagement. From these introductory insights obtained by an exercise in comparative linguistics, devotion and commitment are mapped as two opposite, yet inseparable, modes of being of engagement. Both of these modes seem to condition engagement in an ontologically disparate manner. While examining their fundamental structures, some of the canonical concepts of history of philosophy such as being, existence, subjectivity, or world - and also some of its constitutive binary oppositions such as body/mind, individual/collective, transcendence/immanence, light/darkness and sacred/secular - will be reconsidered through the prism of different ontological dispositions that devotion and commitment impose respectively on engagement. The overall aim of this investigation is to bring forth the main existential characteristics of being-engaged, by interpreting the roles of who, where, and what of engagement, and in order to provide a fundamental conceptual apparatus for a critical ontology of engagement.
从奉献到承诺:走向参与的批判本体论
本文从批判本体论的角度来探讨接合的概念。以语言作为其解释学任务的起点,它开始于对各种印欧词的词源分析,这些词围绕着“接触”概念的语义场。从这些通过比较语言学练习获得的介绍性见解中,奉献和承诺被映射为两种相反但不可分割的参与模式。这两种模式似乎都以一种本体论上完全不同的方式来约束参与。在研究它们的基本结构时,哲学史上的一些规范概念,如存在、存在、主体性或世界,以及一些构成二元对立,如身体/心灵、个人/集体、超越/内在、光明/黑暗和神圣/世俗,将通过不同的本体论倾向的棱镜重新考虑,奉献和承诺分别强加于参与。本研究的总体目标是通过解释参与的角色、地点和内容,提出参与的主要存在特征,并为参与的批判本体论提供基本的概念工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信