Assessment Of The Microbial Load And Some Physico-Chemical Parameters Of Some Finished Herbal Liquid Products

O. Uwumarongie, H. A. Okeri
{"title":"Assessment Of The Microbial Load And Some Physico-Chemical Parameters Of Some Finished Herbal Liquid Products","authors":"O. Uwumarongie, H. A. Okeri","doi":"10.4314/JOPHAS.V12I1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the benefits derived from herbal products, they may be contaminated with various impurities. It is therefore important to assess the microbial quality and heavy metal content of herbal preparations, especially liquid preparations and determine their safety profile. Herbal liquid preparations made locally by herbalists and sold to patients in herbal homes were used for this study. One bottle of each of seventeen (17) different liquid herbal preparations was purchased. From each bottle, three aliquot samples were assessed for microbial presence and total viable count. Isolation and identification of the contaminants were also carried out, while other determinations like pH, phytoconstituents, heavy metal and elemental contents were performed using standard methods of analyses. Results showed that, 4 (23.53%) had no microbial contaminants, while 13 (76.47%) were contaminated with various microbes. Of these contaminated preparations, 10 (58.82%) had single contaminants each, of which 1 (10%) had Staphylococcus aureus ; 2 (20%) had Escherichia coli ; 2 (20%) had Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 5 (50%) had C andida albicans . The remaining 3 (17.65%) had 2 contaminants each, of which 1 (33.33%) had E. coli and P. aeruginosa ; 1 (33.33%) had E. coli and Staph. aureus ; and 1 (33.33%) had Klebsiella pneumonia and Candida albicans . Total viable count and pH values of the different preparations ranged from 1.75 x 10 5 – 7.50 x 10 8 organisms/ml and 3.63 – 8.89, respectively. Phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of useful phytoconstituents while elemental analysis revealed the presence of valuable elements whose values all fall within stipulated limits. Thus, the presence of microbes (above limits specified) in a greater percentage of the preparations despite the presence of useful phytoconstituents and elements, could adversely affect the health status of consumers of such herbal liquid preparations.  Keywords : Assessment, Microbial load, Physico-Chemical parameters, Herbal products.","PeriodicalId":16719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences","volume":"85 1","pages":"2166-2180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JOPHAS.V12I1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the benefits derived from herbal products, they may be contaminated with various impurities. It is therefore important to assess the microbial quality and heavy metal content of herbal preparations, especially liquid preparations and determine their safety profile. Herbal liquid preparations made locally by herbalists and sold to patients in herbal homes were used for this study. One bottle of each of seventeen (17) different liquid herbal preparations was purchased. From each bottle, three aliquot samples were assessed for microbial presence and total viable count. Isolation and identification of the contaminants were also carried out, while other determinations like pH, phytoconstituents, heavy metal and elemental contents were performed using standard methods of analyses. Results showed that, 4 (23.53%) had no microbial contaminants, while 13 (76.47%) were contaminated with various microbes. Of these contaminated preparations, 10 (58.82%) had single contaminants each, of which 1 (10%) had Staphylococcus aureus ; 2 (20%) had Escherichia coli ; 2 (20%) had Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 5 (50%) had C andida albicans . The remaining 3 (17.65%) had 2 contaminants each, of which 1 (33.33%) had E. coli and P. aeruginosa ; 1 (33.33%) had E. coli and Staph. aureus ; and 1 (33.33%) had Klebsiella pneumonia and Candida albicans . Total viable count and pH values of the different preparations ranged from 1.75 x 10 5 – 7.50 x 10 8 organisms/ml and 3.63 – 8.89, respectively. Phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of useful phytoconstituents while elemental analysis revealed the presence of valuable elements whose values all fall within stipulated limits. Thus, the presence of microbes (above limits specified) in a greater percentage of the preparations despite the presence of useful phytoconstituents and elements, could adversely affect the health status of consumers of such herbal liquid preparations.  Keywords : Assessment, Microbial load, Physico-Chemical parameters, Herbal products.
部分中药饮料液的微生物负荷及理化参数评价
尽管草药产品有很多好处,但它们可能被各种杂质污染。因此,评估草药制剂,特别是液体制剂的微生物质量和重金属含量并确定其安全性是很重要的。本研究使用的是当地草药师制作的草药液体制剂,并在草药家中出售给患者。购买了17种不同的液体草药制剂各一瓶。从每个瓶子中,评估三个等分样品的微生物存在和总活菌数。还对污染物进行了分离和鉴定,同时使用标准分析方法进行了pH、植物成分、重金属和元素含量等其他测定。结果显示,4份(23.53%)未发现微生物污染,13份(76.47%)存在各种微生物污染。其中10份(58.82%)为单一污染物,1份(10%)为金黄色葡萄球菌;2例(20%)感染大肠杆菌;铜绿假单胞菌2例(20%),白色念珠菌5例(50%)。其余3例(17.65%)各检出2种污染物,其中大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌各检出1例(33.33%);1例(33.33%)检出大肠杆菌和葡萄球菌。葡萄球菌;肺炎克雷伯菌和白色念珠菌1例(33.33%)。不同制剂的总活菌数和pH值分别为1.75 × 10.5 ~ 7.50 × 108个生物体/ml和3.63 ~ 8.89。植物化学分析显示存在有用的植物成分,元素分析显示存在有价值的元素,其值均在规定的范围内。因此,尽管存在有用的植物成分和元素,但在更大比例的制剂中存在微生物(超过规定的限度)可能对此类草药液体制剂的消费者的健康状况产生不利影响。关键词:评价;微生物负荷;理化参数;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信