Team Coordination Dynamics Measurement in Enroute Care Training: Defining Requirements and Usability Study

Jennifer Winner, Jayde M. King, Jamie C. Gorman, David A. Grimm
{"title":"Team Coordination Dynamics Measurement in Enroute Care Training: Defining Requirements and Usability Study","authors":"Jennifer Winner, Jayde M. King, Jamie C. Gorman, David A. Grimm","doi":"10.1177/2327857922111004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research indicates a need for objective and reliable measures of team communication and coordination. This need rings true for United States Air Force (USAF) teams, whose instructors heavily employ subjective evaluations within fast-paced training. Instructors must observe a multitude of teams and their communications, leaving room for varied evaluations and missed opportunities for feedback. Recent studies have advanced and tested team coordination measures based on dynamical systems theory, yielding results that illustrate the relationship between team communication flow and performance. This work leverages those measures and applies them in the context of USAF medical training. In this study, we assess the usability of a Team Dynamics Measurement System prototype. Users (n = 4) completed 15 tasks and evaluated system usability, perceived mental effort, system satisfaction, and task difficulty. Results indicate marginally acceptable overall system usability. These results helped identify essential interface modifications for future iterations. Future work and use cases for instructor support are discussed.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"31 1","pages":"21 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857922111004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Prior research indicates a need for objective and reliable measures of team communication and coordination. This need rings true for United States Air Force (USAF) teams, whose instructors heavily employ subjective evaluations within fast-paced training. Instructors must observe a multitude of teams and their communications, leaving room for varied evaluations and missed opportunities for feedback. Recent studies have advanced and tested team coordination measures based on dynamical systems theory, yielding results that illustrate the relationship between team communication flow and performance. This work leverages those measures and applies them in the context of USAF medical training. In this study, we assess the usability of a Team Dynamics Measurement System prototype. Users (n = 4) completed 15 tasks and evaluated system usability, perceived mental effort, system satisfaction, and task difficulty. Results indicate marginally acceptable overall system usability. These results helped identify essential interface modifications for future iterations. Future work and use cases for instructor support are discussed.
全程护理培训中的团队协调动态测量:需求定义与可用性研究
先前的研究表明,需要客观可靠的团队沟通和协调措施。这种需求对美国空军(USAF)团队来说是真实的,他们的教官在快节奏的训练中大量使用主观评估。教师必须观察多个团队及其沟通,为各种评估留出空间,并错过反馈的机会。最近的研究在动力系统理论的基础上提出并测试了团队协调措施,得出的结果说明了团队沟通流与绩效之间的关系。这项工作利用了这些措施,并将其应用于美国空军医学培训。在本研究中,我们评估了团队动力测量系统原型的可用性。用户(n = 4)完成了15个任务,并评估了系统可用性、感知心理努力、系统满意度和任务难度。结果表明总体系统可用性勉强可以接受。这些结果有助于为将来的迭代确定必要的接口修改。讨论了讲师支持的未来工作和用例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信