J. Guiomar, L. Ribeiro, A. Ribeiro, A. Abrantes, J. Pinheiro, Rui Almeida, Kevin Azevedo
{"title":"Image Quality Assessment of Head CT: Control Charts as an Useful Instrument","authors":"J. Guiomar, L. Ribeiro, A. Ribeiro, A. Abrantes, J. Pinheiro, Rui Almeida, Kevin Azevedo","doi":"10.5923/S.AJBE.101310.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Themain objective of this research was to determine if the diagnostic image, acquired by CT scan, meets the quality criteria previously established for head CT exams. A total of 360 Head Co mputed Tomography exams were analy zed, using a checklist. For data collect ion, quality criteria were created, organized into four criteria groups, consisting of multip le items that must appear in the images studies. After data processing, a large number o f non-conformexaminations were identified in than more than 50% of the sample. We concluded the main causes of these results are: the \"incorrect or incomp lete positioning\", the \"lack of name of the radiographer and \"mot ion artefacts\". Therefore it is essential to implement a checklist for a systematic evaluationof procedures.","PeriodicalId":7620,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biomedical Engineering","volume":"37 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5923/S.AJBE.101310.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Themain objective of this research was to determine if the diagnostic image, acquired by CT scan, meets the quality criteria previously established for head CT exams. A total of 360 Head Co mputed Tomography exams were analy zed, using a checklist. For data collect ion, quality criteria were created, organized into four criteria groups, consisting of multip le items that must appear in the images studies. After data processing, a large number o f non-conformexaminations were identified in than more than 50% of the sample. We concluded the main causes of these results are: the "incorrect or incomp lete positioning", the "lack of name of the radiographer and "mot ion artefacts". Therefore it is essential to implement a checklist for a systematic evaluationof procedures.