On Léon van Hove's 1952 article on the foundations of Quantum Field Theory

Fulvio Sbisà
{"title":"On Léon van Hove's 1952 article on the foundations of Quantum Field Theory","authors":"Fulvio Sbisà","doi":"10.1590/1806-9126-rbef-2020-0256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1952, Leon van Hove published an article, in French, with the title ``Les difficultes de divergences pour um modele particulier de champ quantifie''. The article is frequently cited in relation to Haag's theorem and to the issue of the existence of unitarily inequivalent representations of the canonical commutation relations in Quantum Field Theory. Summarizing in brief, it suggests a link between the appearance of divergences in perturbative Quantum Field Theory and the fact that quantum states belonging to an interacting theory do not belong to the same Hilbert space of the free theory. It also suggests that renormalization fails to provide an accurate description of the time evolution of the quantum field, although it correctly accounts for the S matrix. Due to its relevance, and to the difficulty of finding an English translation, the ideas contained in this article are proposed again here, expanded with derivations and accompanied by a discussion aimed at putting the analysis into context. We highlight the main points from the perspective of a contemporary reader, and underline the differences with the standard approach usually taught in curricular courses in Quantum Field Theory.","PeriodicalId":8443,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: High Energy Physics - Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: High Energy Physics - Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-rbef-2020-0256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 1952, Leon van Hove published an article, in French, with the title ``Les difficultes de divergences pour um modele particulier de champ quantifie''. The article is frequently cited in relation to Haag's theorem and to the issue of the existence of unitarily inequivalent representations of the canonical commutation relations in Quantum Field Theory. Summarizing in brief, it suggests a link between the appearance of divergences in perturbative Quantum Field Theory and the fact that quantum states belonging to an interacting theory do not belong to the same Hilbert space of the free theory. It also suggests that renormalization fails to provide an accurate description of the time evolution of the quantum field, although it correctly accounts for the S matrix. Due to its relevance, and to the difficulty of finding an English translation, the ideas contained in this article are proposed again here, expanded with derivations and accompanied by a discussion aimed at putting the analysis into context. We highlight the main points from the perspective of a contemporary reader, and underline the differences with the standard approach usually taught in curricular courses in Quantum Field Theory.
论lsamon van Hove 1952年关于量子场论基础的文章
1952年,里昂·凡·霍夫用法语发表了一篇文章,题为《Les difficult de divergence pour um modele speciulier de champ quantifie》。这篇文章经常被引用于哈格定理和量子场论中正则交换关系的酉不等价表示的存在性问题。简而言之,它表明微扰量子场论中发散的出现与属于相互作用理论的量子态不属于自由理论的相同希尔伯特空间这一事实之间存在联系。它还表明,重整化不能提供量子场时间演化的准确描述,尽管它正确地解释了S矩阵。由于其相关性,以及寻找英文翻译的难度,本文中包含的观点在这里再次提出,并通过衍生进行扩展,并伴随着旨在将分析置于上下文中的讨论。我们从当代读者的角度强调了主要观点,并强调了与量子场论课程中通常教授的标准方法的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信