Effectiveness of restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with combined atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter

Y. Zinchenko, T. Mikhalieva, O. Ilchyshyna
{"title":"Effectiveness of restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with combined atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter","authors":"Y. Zinchenko, T. Mikhalieva, O. Ilchyshyna","doi":"10.31928/1608-635X-2021.2.3341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim – to compare the effectiveness of restoration of sinus rhythm by transesophageal pacing (TEECP) in patients with prolonged episodes of isolated typical atrial flutter (AFl) and in patients with a combination of atrial fibrillation (AF) and AFl.Materials and methods. 325 procedures of TEECP were performed in cases of longlasting episodes of AFl: from 8 days to 2 years (average 68.2±4.76 days). Prior to hospitalization, all subjects underwent ineffective medical cardioversion. The sinus rhythm was restored using TEECP, and in case of its ineffectiveness by means of electropulse therapy (EPT). All patients were divided into two groups: group I (n=237) – patients with a lone atrial flutter, and group II (n=88) – patients with the history of AF or in case of transformation AF into AFl because of antiarrhythmic therapy. Both groups were comparable by age, paroxysm duration, presence of hypertension and organic disorders of the heart conductive system, comorbidities, echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters. Electrocardiographical parameters revealed no significant differences in the tachycardia cycle length and the average frequency of ventricular contractions.Results and discussion. Patients in the group II were characterized by a significantly longer history of arrhythmia, more severe heart failure, higher frequency of arrhythmia paroxysms and detection of thyroid disorders; recorded significantly lower amplitudes of the F wave on the surface electrocardiogram and A wave on the esophageal electrogram, which was associated with the processes of electrophysiological remodeling of the atria. Also, in contrast to patients with typical AFl, there was a significant decrease in the effectiveness of TEECP (63.6 and 89 %); more frequent use of EPT (10.2 and 3 %) and more often arrhythmia has transformed into a permanent form (25 and 7.2 %).Conclusions. In patients with prolonged episodes of typical AFl, a highly effective method of cardioversion is TEECP, regardless of the arrhythmia duration. In patients with concomitant AF, the restoration of sinus rhythm should be performed by EPT, due to its higher efficancy.","PeriodicalId":23419,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Journal of Cardiology","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31928/1608-635X-2021.2.3341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim – to compare the effectiveness of restoration of sinus rhythm by transesophageal pacing (TEECP) in patients with prolonged episodes of isolated typical atrial flutter (AFl) and in patients with a combination of atrial fibrillation (AF) and AFl.Materials and methods. 325 procedures of TEECP were performed in cases of longlasting episodes of AFl: from 8 days to 2 years (average 68.2±4.76 days). Prior to hospitalization, all subjects underwent ineffective medical cardioversion. The sinus rhythm was restored using TEECP, and in case of its ineffectiveness by means of electropulse therapy (EPT). All patients were divided into two groups: group I (n=237) – patients with a lone atrial flutter, and group II (n=88) – patients with the history of AF or in case of transformation AF into AFl because of antiarrhythmic therapy. Both groups were comparable by age, paroxysm duration, presence of hypertension and organic disorders of the heart conductive system, comorbidities, echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters. Electrocardiographical parameters revealed no significant differences in the tachycardia cycle length and the average frequency of ventricular contractions.Results and discussion. Patients in the group II were characterized by a significantly longer history of arrhythmia, more severe heart failure, higher frequency of arrhythmia paroxysms and detection of thyroid disorders; recorded significantly lower amplitudes of the F wave on the surface electrocardiogram and A wave on the esophageal electrogram, which was associated with the processes of electrophysiological remodeling of the atria. Also, in contrast to patients with typical AFl, there was a significant decrease in the effectiveness of TEECP (63.6 and 89 %); more frequent use of EPT (10.2 and 3 %) and more often arrhythmia has transformed into a permanent form (25 and 7.2 %).Conclusions. In patients with prolonged episodes of typical AFl, a highly effective method of cardioversion is TEECP, regardless of the arrhythmia duration. In patients with concomitant AF, the restoration of sinus rhythm should be performed by EPT, due to its higher efficancy.
心房颤动合并心房扑动患者窦性心律恢复的有效性
目的是比较经食管起搏(TEECP)在孤立性典型心房扑动(AFl)和合并心房颤动(AF)和心房扑动(AFl)的患者中恢复窦性心律的有效性。材料和方法。对AFl持续时间较长的病例进行了325例TEECP手术:从8天到2年(平均68.2±4.76天)。入院前,所有受试者均接受无效的药物心律转复。采用TEECP恢复窦性心律,无效时采用电脉冲治疗(EPT)。所有患者被分为两组:第一组(n=237) -单发心房扑动患者,第二组(n=88) -有房颤病史或因抗心律失常治疗而房颤转化为房颤的患者。两组在年龄、发作时间、高血压和心脏传导系统器质性疾病的存在、合并症、超声心动图和血流动力学参数方面具有可比性。心电图参数显示心动过速周期长度和心室收缩的平均频率无显著差异。结果和讨论。II组患者的特点是心律失常病史明显更长,心衰更严重,心律失常发作频率更高,甲状腺功能障碍检测也更高;体表心电图F波和食管电图A波振幅均明显降低,与心房电生理重构过程有关。此外,与典型AFl患者相比,TEECP的有效性显著降低(63.6%和89%);更频繁地使用EPT(10.2%和3%)和更频繁地心律失常转化为永久性形式(25%和7.2%)。对于典型AFl发作时间延长的患者,无论心律失常持续时间长短,TEECP都是一种非常有效的复律方法。对于合并房颤的患者,窦性心律恢复应采用EPT,其疗效更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信