Come fermare una grande recessione. Il dibattito sulla crisi economica del 1929 in Italia

IF 0.2 Q4 LINGUISTICS

Studi e Saggi Linguistici Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.36253/978-88-5518-455-7.01

A. Magliulo

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to assess how the debate on the Great Depression of 1929 changed Italian economic culture in the transition from Fascism to the Republic. The essay is divided into three paragraphs. In the first, we will look at the international debate dominated by the dispute between Hayek and Keynes and by Röpke’s synthesis. In the second, we will analyse the debate in Italy, which is characterised by the convergent synthesis proposed by Bresciani Turroni, Einaudi and Fanno. The last section will outline the economic policy choices of the Fascist regime and the legacy of the debate on the great crisis in the period of post-war reconstruction

查看原文本刊更多论文

如何阻止大衰退。关于1929年意大利经济危机的辩论

本文的目的是评估关于1929年大萧条的辩论如何在从法西斯主义向共和国过渡的过程中改变意大利的经济文化。这篇文章分为三段。在第一部分中，我们将看到由哈耶克和凯恩斯之间的争论以及Röpke的综合所主导的国际辩论。其次，我们将分析意大利的辩论，其特点是由布雷西亚尼·图罗尼、埃诺迪和范诺提出的收敛综合。最后一部分将概述法西斯政权的经济政策选择和战后重建时期关于大危机的辩论的遗产

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studi e Saggi Linguistici LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： debate in Italy, especially for those scholars working in the field of Indo-European Historical Linguistics and contemporary Theoretical Linguistics. Today, after 50 years of life, Studi e Saggi Linguistici has a firm position in this field, but it also gained a larger international profile, including well-known foreign scholars as members of its Scientific Committee, and fostering the publication of English-written papers. The Editors always aim at publishing original and innovative papers, whose quality and exactness are guaranteed by the prestigious Scientific Committee, and by the anonymous peer-review process. Although a certain preference is accorded to both historical and general Linguistics, in line with the tradition, the Journal welcomes scientific contributions concerning any linguistic field, with no preference or prejudice for particular methodological approaches and theoretical paradigms.