Bone Augmentation with Bovine Bone Xenograft: 5 Years Result of Retrospective Cohort Study

Nasim Mahjoub Pour, H. D. Bruyn
{"title":"Bone Augmentation with Bovine Bone Xenograft: 5 Years Result of Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Nasim Mahjoub Pour, H. D. Bruyn","doi":"10.35248/2247-2452.19.18.1070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the crestal bone loss around the implants following guided bone regeneration in dehiscence and fenestrations and its effect on peri-implant health after a period of five years. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 consecutively treated patients who had received bovine particulate bone augmentation Endobon® (Biomet 3i) were evaluated in a single center. From this cohort, 13 patients were enrolled in the study and the others were drop-outs. 17 implants were installed in the patients. The patients were contacted 5 years after implant loading. All patients had undergone periapical radiographs and orthopantogram immediately after crown installation T0 and then 5 years after placing the implants T1. Digital and analog radiographs were evaluated by one clinician from the patient charts after the crown installation. The periodontal chart was taken, pocket depth, bleeding on probing and plaque amount was scrutinized around each implant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software Results: All implants survived after 5 years of loading. Significant bone loss was revealed between the baseline and the follow-up time at the implant sites. The overall mean bone loss at the implant site was 0.69 (SD: 0.73). On the mesial side for all but two implants (0.03 and 0.04) the evolution was toward bone loss. On the distal side for all but three implants (0.01, 0.02, 0.02) the evolution was toward loss of bone. No difference in the bone loss was seen between mesial and distal sites. 87.5% of the implant sites with bone augmentation showed bleeding on probing. The plaque was seen in 31.3% of the implant sites Conclusion: Bone augmentation with bovine bone hydroxyapatite in one stage implant surgery remained stable during the 5 years follow-up around the minimally rough implants used in this study. However, the amount of bone loss and mucositis at the implant sites with GBR remained significantly high.","PeriodicalId":19556,"journal":{"name":"Oral health and dental management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health and dental management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2247-2452.19.18.1070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the crestal bone loss around the implants following guided bone regeneration in dehiscence and fenestrations and its effect on peri-implant health after a period of five years. Materials and Methods: A total of 41 consecutively treated patients who had received bovine particulate bone augmentation Endobon® (Biomet 3i) were evaluated in a single center. From this cohort, 13 patients were enrolled in the study and the others were drop-outs. 17 implants were installed in the patients. The patients were contacted 5 years after implant loading. All patients had undergone periapical radiographs and orthopantogram immediately after crown installation T0 and then 5 years after placing the implants T1. Digital and analog radiographs were evaluated by one clinician from the patient charts after the crown installation. The periodontal chart was taken, pocket depth, bleeding on probing and plaque amount was scrutinized around each implant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software Results: All implants survived after 5 years of loading. Significant bone loss was revealed between the baseline and the follow-up time at the implant sites. The overall mean bone loss at the implant site was 0.69 (SD: 0.73). On the mesial side for all but two implants (0.03 and 0.04) the evolution was toward bone loss. On the distal side for all but three implants (0.01, 0.02, 0.02) the evolution was toward loss of bone. No difference in the bone loss was seen between mesial and distal sites. 87.5% of the implant sites with bone augmentation showed bleeding on probing. The plaque was seen in 31.3% of the implant sites Conclusion: Bone augmentation with bovine bone hydroxyapatite in one stage implant surgery remained stable during the 5 years follow-up around the minimally rough implants used in this study. However, the amount of bone loss and mucositis at the implant sites with GBR remained significantly high.
牛骨异种移植骨增强:5年回顾性队列研究结果
目的:本研究的目的是在5年的时间里,研究骨裂和开窗引导再生后种植体周围嵴骨的流失及其对种植体周围健康的影响。材料和方法:共41例连续接受牛颗粒骨增强Endobon®(Biomet 3i)治疗的患者在单中心进行评估。从这个队列中,有13名患者参加了研究,其他患者退出了研究。患者共植入17颗种植体。患者在植入种植体5年后联系。所有患者在冠安装后即刻(T0)和放置种植体后5年(T1)分别行根尖周x线片和矫形摄影。数字和模拟x线片由一名临床医生根据冠安装后的患者图表进行评估。检查牙周表,检查牙袋深度、探诊出血和牙菌斑数量。结果:所有种植体在加载5年后均成活。在基线和随访时间之间,种植体部位出现了明显的骨质流失。种植体部位的总体平均骨损失为0.69 (SD: 0.73)。除了两个种植体(0.03和0.04)外,所有种植体的内侧都朝着骨质流失的方向发展。在远端,除了三个种植体(0.01,0.02,0.02)外,所有种植体都朝着骨丢失的方向发展。在近端和远端骨丢失没有差异。87.5%的骨增强种植体部位出现探探出血。结论:在一期种植手术中使用牛骨羟基磷灰石进行骨增强,在本研究中使用的最小粗糙种植体周围的5年随访期间保持稳定。然而,GBR种植体部位的骨质流失和粘膜炎的数量仍然很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信