The New Scientific Foundation of Fluid Therapy in Shock Management

Ahmed Nasr M Ghanem
{"title":"The New Scientific Foundation of Fluid Therapy in Shock Management","authors":"Ahmed Nasr M Ghanem","doi":"10.47829/cos.2021.61301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intravenous fluids are commonly prescribed, but uncertainty remains about how to assess when fluids are required and how much to give [1]. Two recent guidelines have acknowledged a limited evidence base to guide fluid assessment. A recommended means to assess hypovolaemia includes assessment of fluid responsiveness. Fluid responsiveness is a rise in stroke volume following an increase in preload, achieved using a fluid challenge or a passive leg raise. However, the means of defining fluid responsiveness and its ability to identify patients who would benefit from fluid resuscitation is currently unclear.","PeriodicalId":92767,"journal":{"name":"Clinics of surgery","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47829/cos.2021.61301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Intravenous fluids are commonly prescribed, but uncertainty remains about how to assess when fluids are required and how much to give [1]. Two recent guidelines have acknowledged a limited evidence base to guide fluid assessment. A recommended means to assess hypovolaemia includes assessment of fluid responsiveness. Fluid responsiveness is a rise in stroke volume following an increase in preload, achieved using a fluid challenge or a passive leg raise. However, the means of defining fluid responsiveness and its ability to identify patients who would benefit from fluid resuscitation is currently unclear.
休克治疗液体疗法的新科学基础
静脉输液通常是处方,但如何评估何时需要输液以及给多少仍不确定[1]。最近的两项指南承认,指导流体评估的证据基础有限。评估低血容量的推荐方法包括评估液体反应性。液体反应是指预负荷增加后冲程量的增加,通过液体刺激或被动抬腿来实现。然而,定义液体反应的方法及其识别将受益于液体复苏的患者的能力目前尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信