Testing Autonomous Cars for Feature Interaction Failures using Many-Objective Search

Raja Ben Abdessalem, Annibale Panichella, S. Nejati, L. Briand, Thomas Stifter
{"title":"Testing Autonomous Cars for Feature Interaction Failures using Many-Objective Search","authors":"Raja Ben Abdessalem, Annibale Panichella, S. Nejati, L. Briand, Thomas Stifter","doi":"10.1145/3238147.3238192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complex systems such as autonomous cars are typically built as a composition of features that are independent units of functionality. Features tend to interact and impact one another's behavior in unknown ways. A challenge is to detect and manage feature interactions, in particular, those that violate system requirements, hence leading to failures. In this paper, we propose a technique to detect feature interaction failures by casting this problem into a search-based test generation problem. We define a set of hybrid test objectives (distance functions) that combine traditional coverage-based heuristics with new heuristics specifically aimed at revealing feature interaction failures. We develop a new search-based test generation algorithm, called FITEST, that is guided by our hybrid test objectives. FITEST extends recently proposed many-objective evolutionary algorithms to reduce the time required to compute fitness values. We evaluate our approach using two versions of an industrial self-driving system. Our results show that our hybrid test objectives are able to identify more than twice as many feature interaction failures as two baseline test objectives used in the software testing literature (i.e., coverage-based and failure-based test objectives). Further, the feedback from domain experts indicates that the detected feature interaction failures represent real faults in their systems that were not previously identified based on analysis of the system features and their requirements.","PeriodicalId":6622,"journal":{"name":"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","volume":"187 1","pages":"143-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"117","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 33rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3238147.3238192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 117

Abstract

Complex systems such as autonomous cars are typically built as a composition of features that are independent units of functionality. Features tend to interact and impact one another's behavior in unknown ways. A challenge is to detect and manage feature interactions, in particular, those that violate system requirements, hence leading to failures. In this paper, we propose a technique to detect feature interaction failures by casting this problem into a search-based test generation problem. We define a set of hybrid test objectives (distance functions) that combine traditional coverage-based heuristics with new heuristics specifically aimed at revealing feature interaction failures. We develop a new search-based test generation algorithm, called FITEST, that is guided by our hybrid test objectives. FITEST extends recently proposed many-objective evolutionary algorithms to reduce the time required to compute fitness values. We evaluate our approach using two versions of an industrial self-driving system. Our results show that our hybrid test objectives are able to identify more than twice as many feature interaction failures as two baseline test objectives used in the software testing literature (i.e., coverage-based and failure-based test objectives). Further, the feedback from domain experts indicates that the detected feature interaction failures represent real faults in their systems that were not previously identified based on analysis of the system features and their requirements.
使用多目标搜索测试自动驾驶汽车的特征交互故障
像自动驾驶汽车这样的复杂系统通常是由独立的功能单元组成的。功能倾向于以未知的方式相互作用和影响彼此的行为。一个挑战是检测和管理功能交互,特别是那些违反系统需求,从而导致失败的交互。在本文中,我们提出了一种通过将该问题转化为基于搜索的测试生成问题来检测特征交互故障的技术。我们定义了一组混合测试目标(距离函数),将传统的基于覆盖率的启发式方法与专门用于揭示特征交互失败的新启发式方法结合起来。我们开发了一种新的基于搜索的测试生成算法,称为FITEST,它以我们的混合测试目标为指导。FITEST扩展了最近提出的多目标进化算法,以减少计算适应度值所需的时间。我们使用两个版本的工业自动驾驶系统来评估我们的方法。我们的结果表明,我们的混合测试目标能够识别比软件测试文献中使用的两个基线测试目标(即,基于覆盖率和基于失败的测试目标)多两倍的功能交互失败。此外,来自领域专家的反馈表明,检测到的特征交互故障代表了他们的系统中真正的故障,这些故障以前没有根据对系统特征及其需求的分析来识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信