First Successful Deployment of Nonmetallic Casing Strings: A Case History

Fauzia Waluyo, Ali Hijles, Muhammad A. Alhelal
{"title":"First Successful Deployment of Nonmetallic Casing Strings: A Case History","authors":"Fauzia Waluyo, Ali Hijles, Muhammad A. Alhelal","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22660-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the first time, two different sizes of nonmetallic casing strings were installed in water wells to cover shallow potable aquifers. This paper describes the reasons for deployment, planning and design, logistics, operational challenges, lessons learned, and the way forward for this newly deployed technology.\n In the initial stages of the project, fiberglass-reinforced thermoset resin (RTR) pipes manufactured locally were evaluated in terms of ratings, dimension, and method of connection and feasibility for downhole applications. Two nonmetallic casing strings, 19.7″ and 11″, were selected to be run in hole. Design consideration also included compatibility with available casing running and handling tools to ensure safe and efficient field handling and running. At this stage, carbon steel casings were still needed to connect the nonmetallic casing to the surface wellhead equipment and to the float equipment at the bottom of the string. Specially designed crossovers were manufactured and tested prior to enabling combination of nonmetallic and carbon steel casing. All manufactured casing joints and crossovers were tested based on the best available criteria for the nonmetallic industry.\n Different challenges were encountered in the design stage, such as overcoming the buoyancy force while running and cementing the nonmetallic casing, all of which to be tackled. Cement slurry design and casing accessories were modified based on the simulations scenarios that were run. These designs were subsequently modified in response to issues, i.e., total losses, encountered while drilling.\n Successful evaluation of the nonmetallic casing deployment was conducted from multiple aspects, including running efficiency, casing wear, and cement quality. Drillpipe protectors were utilized to reduce the possible casing damage due to wear.\n The nonmetallic casing joints were connected through crossovers to a top metallic casing and float equipment at bottom. Both casing strings were successfully run to depth and cemented in place.\n Both casings were pressure tested successfully after performing the logging jobs that indicated the level and quality of cement pumped around the strings. Logs showed no considerable change in both nonmetallic casing thickness.\n The well was completed with open hole, tested and flowed naturally to surface. A conventional power water injector wellhead was installed before release.\n The design, review and assessment processes, as well as several lessons learned from the first ever deployment of the nonmetallic casing in a water supply well, are the key takeaways from this paper.","PeriodicalId":11027,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, February 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22660-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the first time, two different sizes of nonmetallic casing strings were installed in water wells to cover shallow potable aquifers. This paper describes the reasons for deployment, planning and design, logistics, operational challenges, lessons learned, and the way forward for this newly deployed technology. In the initial stages of the project, fiberglass-reinforced thermoset resin (RTR) pipes manufactured locally were evaluated in terms of ratings, dimension, and method of connection and feasibility for downhole applications. Two nonmetallic casing strings, 19.7″ and 11″, were selected to be run in hole. Design consideration also included compatibility with available casing running and handling tools to ensure safe and efficient field handling and running. At this stage, carbon steel casings were still needed to connect the nonmetallic casing to the surface wellhead equipment and to the float equipment at the bottom of the string. Specially designed crossovers were manufactured and tested prior to enabling combination of nonmetallic and carbon steel casing. All manufactured casing joints and crossovers were tested based on the best available criteria for the nonmetallic industry. Different challenges were encountered in the design stage, such as overcoming the buoyancy force while running and cementing the nonmetallic casing, all of which to be tackled. Cement slurry design and casing accessories were modified based on the simulations scenarios that were run. These designs were subsequently modified in response to issues, i.e., total losses, encountered while drilling. Successful evaluation of the nonmetallic casing deployment was conducted from multiple aspects, including running efficiency, casing wear, and cement quality. Drillpipe protectors were utilized to reduce the possible casing damage due to wear. The nonmetallic casing joints were connected through crossovers to a top metallic casing and float equipment at bottom. Both casing strings were successfully run to depth and cemented in place. Both casings were pressure tested successfully after performing the logging jobs that indicated the level and quality of cement pumped around the strings. Logs showed no considerable change in both nonmetallic casing thickness. The well was completed with open hole, tested and flowed naturally to surface. A conventional power water injector wellhead was installed before release. The design, review and assessment processes, as well as several lessons learned from the first ever deployment of the nonmetallic casing in a water supply well, are the key takeaways from this paper.
非金属套管柱首次成功下入:案例历史
首次在水井中安装了两种不同尺寸的非金属套管柱,以覆盖浅层饮用水含水层。本文描述了部署的原因、规划和设计、后勤、操作挑战、经验教训以及这种新部署技术的前进方向。在项目的初始阶段,对当地生产的玻璃纤维增强热固性树脂(RTR)管材的等级、尺寸、连接方法和井下应用的可行性进行了评估。选择19.7″和11″两种非金属套管柱下入井中。设计考虑还包括与现有套管下入和处理工具的兼容性,以确保安全高效的现场处理和下入。在这个阶段,仍然需要碳钢套管将非金属套管连接到地面井口设备和管柱底部的浮子设备。在非金属套管和碳钢套管结合之前,专门设计的跨界器进行了制造和测试。所有制造的套管接头和交叉接头都根据非金属行业的最佳标准进行了测试。在设计阶段遇到了不同的挑战,例如在下入和固井非金属套管时克服浮力,所有这些都需要解决。根据所运行的模拟场景,对水泥浆设计和套管附件进行了修改。随后,针对钻井过程中遇到的总漏失等问题,对这些设计进行了修改。从下入效率、套管磨损和水泥质量等多个方面对非金属套管下入进行了成功的评估。钻杆保护器用于减少因磨损造成的套管损坏。非金属套管接头通过交叉接头连接到顶部的金属套管和底部的浮子设备。两套管柱均成功下入深度并固井。在完成测井作业后,两套套管都进行了成功的压力测试,表明了管柱周围泵送的水泥的水平和质量。测井数据显示,两种非金属套管的厚度没有明显变化。该井采用裸眼完井、测试并自然流至地面。在释放之前安装了传统的动力注水井口。设计、审查和评估过程,以及从首次在供水井中使用非金属套管中吸取的经验教训,是本文的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信