Evaluation of mental and physical health indicators among elderly residents and non-residents of elderly homes based on TOPSIS technique(In 2017-2018)

Mohsen Niazi, S. Miri, M. Aghighi
{"title":"Evaluation of mental and physical health indicators among elderly residents and non-residents of elderly homes based on TOPSIS technique(In 2017-2018)","authors":"Mohsen Niazi, S. Miri, M. Aghighi","doi":"10.29252/joge.4.1.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Iran has surpassed its population structure changes to an elderly country, as a result, their mental and physical health problems become important. This study aimed to compare the mental and physical health of resident and non-resident elderly people. Method: this research is cross sectional conducted in Tehran city. Statistical sample in this research include 160 elders in three groups resident in home, elders resident in private and public elderly homes. Australian Ministry of Health questionnaires have been used to collect data that reliability and validity of questionnaires has been proven by Alizade et al (2008). In addition, TOPSIS technique has been used for data analysis. Results: Among the factors affecting mental and physical health, the option of elderly living at home with index 0.044291 is in the first rank, the second is the elderly living in a private sanatorium with the index 0.005953 and elderly living in a public sanitary are in third rank with the index 0.004557. Conclusion: The results showed that there is a significant difference between the elderly living in the private and public sanatorium in terms of mental and physical health and its components. The most important factors are: psychological distress index, that in terms of less importance of this index, elderly living in home are in first rank, elderly living in the private nursing homes are in the second rank and the elderly living in the public sanatorium are in third rank. Physical performance evaluation and evaluation of everyday activities performance in terms of most important of this factor, elderly living in home are in the first rank, elderly living in the private nursing homes are in the second rank and the elderly living in the public sanatorium are in third rank.","PeriodicalId":15922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gerontology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/joge.4.1.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Iran has surpassed its population structure changes to an elderly country, as a result, their mental and physical health problems become important. This study aimed to compare the mental and physical health of resident and non-resident elderly people. Method: this research is cross sectional conducted in Tehran city. Statistical sample in this research include 160 elders in three groups resident in home, elders resident in private and public elderly homes. Australian Ministry of Health questionnaires have been used to collect data that reliability and validity of questionnaires has been proven by Alizade et al (2008). In addition, TOPSIS technique has been used for data analysis. Results: Among the factors affecting mental and physical health, the option of elderly living at home with index 0.044291 is in the first rank, the second is the elderly living in a private sanatorium with the index 0.005953 and elderly living in a public sanitary are in third rank with the index 0.004557. Conclusion: The results showed that there is a significant difference between the elderly living in the private and public sanatorium in terms of mental and physical health and its components. The most important factors are: psychological distress index, that in terms of less importance of this index, elderly living in home are in first rank, elderly living in the private nursing homes are in the second rank and the elderly living in the public sanatorium are in third rank. Physical performance evaluation and evaluation of everyday activities performance in terms of most important of this factor, elderly living in home are in the first rank, elderly living in the private nursing homes are in the second rank and the elderly living in the public sanatorium are in third rank.
基于TOPSIS技术的敬老院老年人与非居民身心健康指标评价(2017-2018年)
导读:伊朗人口结构已超过其老龄化国家,因此,其身心健康问题变得重要。本研究旨在比较常住老人与非常住老人的身心健康状况。方法:本研究采用横断面方法在德黑兰市进行。本研究的统计样本共160名长者,分为三组,分别是住家长者、私家安老院长者和公立安老院长者。使用澳大利亚卫生部的问卷收集数据,Alizade等人(2008年)已经证明了问卷的可靠性和有效性。此外,还采用了TOPSIS技术进行数据分析。结果:在影响身心健康的因素中,居家养老老年人的选择指数为0.044291,居首位;私人疗养院养老老年人的选择指数为0.005953,居第二位;公共卫生所养老老年人的选择指数为0.004557,居第三位。结论:结果表明,私立疗养院与公立疗养院老年人在身心健康及其构成要素方面存在显著差异。最重要的因素是:心理困扰指数,就该指数的重要性而言,居家老人排名第一,私立养老院老人排名第二,公立疗养院老人排名第三。身体表现评价和日常活动表现评价是最重要的这一因素,居家老人排名第一,私立养老院老人排名第二,公立疗养院老人排名第三。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信