Frequency, Intensity, Time And Type Of Tasks Performed During Wildfire Suppression

M. Phillips, K. Netto, W. Payne, D. Nichols, Cara Lord, Neil Brooksbank, B. Aisbett
{"title":"Frequency, Intensity, Time And Type Of Tasks Performed During Wildfire Suppression","authors":"M. Phillips, K. Netto, W. Payne, D. Nichols, Cara Lord, Neil Brooksbank, B. Aisbett","doi":"10.4172/2329-6879.1000199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To quantify the frequency, intensity, duration, and type of tasks performed by Australian rural fire crews when suppressing wildfires. \nMethods: Twenty-eight Australian rural firefighters worked across four, six-hour shifts fighting to curtail the spread of wildfire. Each firefighter wore a heart rate monitor and personal global positioning system (GPS) unit and was followed by a researcher filming their work activity. Video footage of each firefighter was synchronized with their heart rate and GPS data to quantify the frequency, intensity and duration of individual fireground tasks. Fireground tasks were isolated using a previously conducted job task analysis. \nResults: Firefighters performed 32 distinct fireground tasks. Task frequencies ranged from once to 103 times per six-hour shift. Individual tasks lasted 4 ± 2 s to 461 ± 387 s, were performed at speeds ranging from 0.12 ± 0.08 m•s-1 to 0.79 ± 0.40 m•s-1 and elicited mean heart rates that ranged between 97 ± 16 beats•min-1 (55.7 ± 8.7 percentage of age-predicted maximum heart rate (HRmax)) and 157 ± 15 beats•min-1 (86.2 ± 10.8%HRmax). \nConclusion: Fireground tasks were, generally speaking, shorter, slower, and elicited lower heart rates than equivalent tasks previously simulated and reported in the literature. The differences between naturally occurring and simulated tasks question the value of isolated task simulations for conducting physical demands analyses en-route to developing job-specific fitness tests.","PeriodicalId":19397,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine and health affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine and health affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6879.1000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the frequency, intensity, duration, and type of tasks performed by Australian rural fire crews when suppressing wildfires. Methods: Twenty-eight Australian rural firefighters worked across four, six-hour shifts fighting to curtail the spread of wildfire. Each firefighter wore a heart rate monitor and personal global positioning system (GPS) unit and was followed by a researcher filming their work activity. Video footage of each firefighter was synchronized with their heart rate and GPS data to quantify the frequency, intensity and duration of individual fireground tasks. Fireground tasks were isolated using a previously conducted job task analysis. Results: Firefighters performed 32 distinct fireground tasks. Task frequencies ranged from once to 103 times per six-hour shift. Individual tasks lasted 4 ± 2 s to 461 ± 387 s, were performed at speeds ranging from 0.12 ± 0.08 m•s-1 to 0.79 ± 0.40 m•s-1 and elicited mean heart rates that ranged between 97 ± 16 beats•min-1 (55.7 ± 8.7 percentage of age-predicted maximum heart rate (HRmax)) and 157 ± 15 beats•min-1 (86.2 ± 10.8%HRmax). Conclusion: Fireground tasks were, generally speaking, shorter, slower, and elicited lower heart rates than equivalent tasks previously simulated and reported in the literature. The differences between naturally occurring and simulated tasks question the value of isolated task simulations for conducting physical demands analyses en-route to developing job-specific fitness tests.
在扑灭野火期间执行的任务的频率、强度、时间和类型
目的:量化澳大利亚农村消防人员在扑灭野火时所执行的任务的频率、强度、持续时间和类型。方法:28名澳大利亚农村消防员每班工作4、6小时,以遏制野火的蔓延。每位消防员都佩戴心率监测器和个人全球定位系统(GPS)装置,并由一名研究人员跟踪拍摄他们的工作活动。每个消防员的视频片段与他们的心率和GPS数据同步,以量化个人消防任务的频率、强度和持续时间。使用先前进行的工作任务分析来隔离火场任务。结果:消防员执行了32项不同的火场任务。任务频率从每6小时轮班一次到103次不等。单个任务持续4±2秒至461±387秒,速度范围为0.12±0.08 m•s-1至0.79±0.40 m•s-1,平均心率范围为97±16次•min-1(占年龄预测最大心率(HRmax)的55.7±8.7 %)和157±15次•min-1(占年龄预测最大心率(HRmax)的86.2±10.8%)。结论:一般来说,火场任务比先前模拟和文献报道的同等任务更短,更慢,引起的心率更低。自然发生的任务和模拟任务之间的差异质疑了孤立任务模拟在制定特定工作体能测试的过程中进行身体需求分析的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信