Evaluation of awareness, acceptability, and clinical outcome of postpartum vaginal insertion and intra-cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device

Shilpa Gupta, K. Modi, Latika Maheta
{"title":"Evaluation of awareness, acceptability, and clinical outcome of postpartum vaginal insertion and intra-cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device","authors":"Shilpa Gupta, K. Modi, Latika Maheta","doi":"10.5455/njppp.2023.13.10478202214112022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Post-placental and intra-cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) is a lucrative family planning method which provides safe, effective reversible, inexpensive, non-hormonal, and long-acting contraception. Aims and Objectives: The objective of the study is to evaluate the postpartum insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device in terms of awareness, acceptance, safety, efficacy, continuation, and removal rate and its complications in both vaginal as well as intra-cesarean section (CS) insertion. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study conducted in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department GMERS sola for 6 months. Two thousand and ninety-four pregnant women from labor room who delivered vaginally or by CS during study period were asked regarding their knowledge and acceptability for PPIUCD. Results: Total 2094 women evaluated for awareness and acceptance for PPIUCD. About 68.66% were familiar with the concept with 29.99% giving verbal consent for its insertion. About 60.01% women refused for various reasons. Conclusion: This study shows that PPIUCD insertion is a safe and convenient method which requires more population awareness, counseling, and usage.","PeriodicalId":18969,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2023.13.10478202214112022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-placental and intra-cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) is a lucrative family planning method which provides safe, effective reversible, inexpensive, non-hormonal, and long-acting contraception. Aims and Objectives: The objective of the study is to evaluate the postpartum insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device in terms of awareness, acceptance, safety, efficacy, continuation, and removal rate and its complications in both vaginal as well as intra-cesarean section (CS) insertion. Materials and Methods: Prospective observational study conducted in Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department GMERS sola for 6 months. Two thousand and ninety-four pregnant women from labor room who delivered vaginally or by CS during study period were asked regarding their knowledge and acceptability for PPIUCD. Results: Total 2094 women evaluated for awareness and acceptance for PPIUCD. About 68.66% were familiar with the concept with 29.99% giving verbal consent for its insertion. About 60.01% women refused for various reasons. Conclusion: This study shows that PPIUCD insertion is a safe and convenient method which requires more population awareness, counseling, and usage.
产后阴道置入和剖宫产置入宫内节育器的认知度、可接受性及临床结果评价
背景:胎盘后和剖宫产内置入宫内节育器(PPIUCD)是一种安全、有效、可逆、廉价、非激素、长效避孕的计划生育方法。目的和目的:本研究的目的是评价产后插入宫内节育器的认知度、接受度、安全性、有效性、持续时间、取出率及其在阴道和剖宫产(CS)插入中的并发症。材料与方法:前瞻性观察性研究在妇产科GMERS sola进行,为期6个月。本研究调查了2494名在研究期间顺产或剖腹产的产房孕妇对PPIUCD的了解程度和接受程度。结果:共评估了2094名妇女对PPIUCD的认识和接受程度。68.66%的受访者熟悉该概念,29.99%的受访者口头同意该概念的引入。约60.01%的女性因各种原因拒绝。结论:PPIUCD插入是一种安全、方便的方法,但需要更多的人群意识、咨询和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信