The Choice for Sanctions

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Erik Jones
{"title":"The Choice for Sanctions","authors":"Erik Jones","doi":"10.1080/00396338.2023.2218705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Western sanctions against Russia have proven less effective than expected. They have had a powerful impact on the Russian economy, but they neither deterred Russia from attacking, nor prevented the Russian government from financing its war efforts. This was only to be expected. Sanctions rarely achieve their political objectives. Still, there was no alternative. Western powers could not have failed to respond to Russian aggression. The question is one of consequences – not just for Russia, but for the West too. Agathe Demarais argues that the aggressive use of sanctions may backfire against American interests. She makes this argument in general terms; the sanctions on Russia are only among the most recent illustrations. US efforts to restrict China’s access to advanced microchip technology are even more misguided, Demarais suggests. But how did White House officials miss this? In fact, they probably did not. What Demarais calls ‘backfire’ may be intrinsic to the Biden administration’s ‘foreign policy for the middle class’.","PeriodicalId":51535,"journal":{"name":"Survival","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survival","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2023.2218705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Western sanctions against Russia have proven less effective than expected. They have had a powerful impact on the Russian economy, but they neither deterred Russia from attacking, nor prevented the Russian government from financing its war efforts. This was only to be expected. Sanctions rarely achieve their political objectives. Still, there was no alternative. Western powers could not have failed to respond to Russian aggression. The question is one of consequences – not just for Russia, but for the West too. Agathe Demarais argues that the aggressive use of sanctions may backfire against American interests. She makes this argument in general terms; the sanctions on Russia are only among the most recent illustrations. US efforts to restrict China’s access to advanced microchip technology are even more misguided, Demarais suggests. But how did White House officials miss this? In fact, they probably did not. What Demarais calls ‘backfire’ may be intrinsic to the Biden administration’s ‘foreign policy for the middle class’.
制裁的选择
西方对俄罗斯的制裁没有预期的那么有效。它们对俄罗斯经济产生了巨大的影响,但既没有阻止俄罗斯的进攻,也没有阻止俄罗斯政府为其战争努力提供资金。这是意料之中的事。制裁很少能达到其政治目的。但是,没有别的选择。西方大国不可能不回应俄罗斯的侵略。问题是后果之一——不仅对俄罗斯,对西方也是如此。阿加特·德马雷认为,积极使用制裁可能会适得其反,损害美国的利益。她笼统地提出了这个论点;对俄罗斯的制裁只是最近的例证之一。德马雷表示,美国限制中国获得先进微芯片技术的努力甚至更有误导性。但白宫官员怎么会错过这一点呢?事实上,他们可能没有。德马雷所说的“适得其反”可能是拜登政府“面向中产阶级的外交政策”的内在因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Survival
Survival Multiple-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Survival, the Institute"s bi-monthly journal, is a leading forum for analysis and debate of international and strategic affairs. With a diverse range of authors, thoughtful reviews and review essays, Survival is scholarly in depth while vivid, well-written and policy-relevant in approach. Shaped by its editors to be both timely and forward-thinking, the journal encourages writers to challenge conventional wisdom and bring fresh, often controversial, perspectives to bear on the strategic issues of the moment. Survival is essential reading for practitioners, analysts, teachers and followers of international affairs. Each issue also contains Book Reviews of the most important recent publications on international politics and security.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信