Counselors' Neuroscience Conceptualizations of Depression

Thom A. Field, Eric T. Beeson, C. Luke, Michelle Ghoston, N. Golubovic
{"title":"Counselors' Neuroscience Conceptualizations of Depression","authors":"Thom A. Field, Eric T. Beeson, C. Luke, Michelle Ghoston, N. Golubovic","doi":"10.17744/mehc.41.3.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors conducted the first-ever study into counselor conceptualization of client problems using neuroscience theories. The authors selected an embedded mixed-methods design. Participants (N = 334) provided quantitative demographic information and responded to an open-ended qualitative question regarding a hypothetical situation of a client asking the counselor to explain depression from a neuroscience perspective. The authors coded, tallied, and transformed qualitative responses to quantitative data via frequency counts. Kappa coefficients for the coding team exceeded the threshold for acceptable reliability. Approximately half of the counselors applied neuroscience theories to explain client experiences of depression (57.7%, n = 194), and some counselors integrated multiple neuroscience theories in their response (23.2%, n = 45). The monoamine and neuroplasticity theories were the two most common neuroscience theories for depression. Implications for research and training are discussed.","PeriodicalId":90224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mental health counseling","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mental health counseling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.41.3.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The authors conducted the first-ever study into counselor conceptualization of client problems using neuroscience theories. The authors selected an embedded mixed-methods design. Participants (N = 334) provided quantitative demographic information and responded to an open-ended qualitative question regarding a hypothetical situation of a client asking the counselor to explain depression from a neuroscience perspective. The authors coded, tallied, and transformed qualitative responses to quantitative data via frequency counts. Kappa coefficients for the coding team exceeded the threshold for acceptable reliability. Approximately half of the counselors applied neuroscience theories to explain client experiences of depression (57.7%, n = 194), and some counselors integrated multiple neuroscience theories in their response (23.2%, n = 45). The monoamine and neuroplasticity theories were the two most common neuroscience theories for depression. Implications for research and training are discussed.
心理咨询师对抑郁症的神经科学概念化
作者利用神经科学理论对咨询师对来访者问题的概念化进行了首次研究。作者选择了一种嵌入式混合方法设计。参与者(N = 334)提供了定量的人口统计信息,并回答了一个开放式的定性问题,该问题涉及一个假设的情况,即客户要求咨询师从神经科学的角度解释抑郁症。作者通过频率计数对定量数据进行编码、统计和定性反应转换。编码团队的Kappa系数超过了可接受可靠性的阈值。大约一半的咨询师应用神经科学理论来解释来访者的抑郁体验(57.7%,n = 194),一些咨询师在他们的回答中整合了多种神经科学理论(23.2%,n = 45)。单胺理论和神经可塑性理论是抑郁症最常见的两种神经科学理论。讨论了对研究和培训的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信