Effect of different types of speech sounds on viral transmissibility: a scoping review

IF 1 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
G. Georgiou
{"title":"Effect of different types of speech sounds on viral transmissibility: a scoping review","authors":"G. Georgiou","doi":"10.1080/2050571X.2021.2014705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Previous evidence suggested that the phonetic features of a given language may modulate the quantity of droplets emitted from the mouth during speech, determining viral transmissibility. This scoping review aims to present the body of research with respect to the effect of different types of speech sounds on the potential transmission of a virus and to evaluate the certainty of evidence of these data. Five online databases were used to extract experimental research studies which were published between 2000 and 2021. Of the 2217 studies initially identified, 11 studies were included in the review. Each individual study was assessed with GRADE to detect their certainty of evidence. Most of the studies focused on the investigation of fricatives and plosives. It was found that plosives might have the most chance to transmit a virus, followed by nasals and fricatives. This chance is significantly reduced for vowels. The majority of the studies were of low or very low evidence. The results can allow epidemiologists to better model the factors that account for potential viral transmission by considering the effect of speech sounds. In addition, they can inform educators and clinicians for better management and reduction of the risk of viral transmission. The evidence provided about how specific speech sounds may contribute to the spread of a virus is very limited and is confined to the investigation of a few types of sounds.","PeriodicalId":43000,"journal":{"name":"Speech Language and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Language and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2021.2014705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Previous evidence suggested that the phonetic features of a given language may modulate the quantity of droplets emitted from the mouth during speech, determining viral transmissibility. This scoping review aims to present the body of research with respect to the effect of different types of speech sounds on the potential transmission of a virus and to evaluate the certainty of evidence of these data. Five online databases were used to extract experimental research studies which were published between 2000 and 2021. Of the 2217 studies initially identified, 11 studies were included in the review. Each individual study was assessed with GRADE to detect their certainty of evidence. Most of the studies focused on the investigation of fricatives and plosives. It was found that plosives might have the most chance to transmit a virus, followed by nasals and fricatives. This chance is significantly reduced for vowels. The majority of the studies were of low or very low evidence. The results can allow epidemiologists to better model the factors that account for potential viral transmission by considering the effect of speech sounds. In addition, they can inform educators and clinicians for better management and reduction of the risk of viral transmission. The evidence provided about how specific speech sounds may contribute to the spread of a virus is very limited and is confined to the investigation of a few types of sounds.
不同类型语音对病毒传播的影响:范围综述
先前的证据表明,一种特定语言的语音特征可能会调节说话时从口腔喷出的飞沫的数量,从而决定病毒的传播性。这一范围审查的目的是介绍有关不同类型的语音对病毒潜在传播的影响的研究主体,并评估这些数据证据的确定性。五个在线数据库用于提取2000年至2021年间发表的实验研究。在最初确定的2217项研究中,有11项研究纳入了综述。每个单独的研究都用GRADE进行评估,以检测其证据的确定性。大多数研究都集中在对摩擦音和爆破音的研究上。研究发现,爆炸物最有可能传播病毒,其次是鼻腔和摩擦剂。对于元音来说,这种可能性大大降低。大多数研究的证据都很低或很低。这一结果可以让流行病学家通过考虑语音的影响,更好地模拟潜在病毒传播的因素。此外,它们可以为教育工作者和临床医生提供信息,以便更好地管理和减少病毒传播的风险。关于特定的语音如何有助于病毒传播的证据非常有限,而且仅限于对几种声音的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Speech Language and Hearing
Speech Language and Hearing AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信