An Exploratory Study to Measure the Value and Reach of a University Press

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Karen India Scot Brinkley-Etzkorn, India Lane, S. Danforth
{"title":"An Exploratory Study to Measure the Value and Reach of a University Press","authors":"Karen India Scot Brinkley-Etzkorn, India Lane, S. Danforth","doi":"10.3138/JSP.50.4.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:University presses publish works of scholarly, intellectual, or creative merit tailored to an audience of specialists or a group with a shared interest. They also connect their host institution to local and regional communities and generate positive publicity for the institution. In recent years, however, university presses have faced increased scrutiny for myriad financial reasons. The purpose of this study was to measure the extrinsic and intrinsic value of one university press by gathering multiple sources of data on productivity, academic reach, and peer comparisons. Additionally, many of the press's recently published authors completed an anonymous online survey about their experiences, preferences, and satisfaction with aspects of the publishing process. Despite the press's recent financial struggles, the results of this study showed evidence of the press's benefits and value, and authors who responded to the survey reported high rates of satisfaction, personal and scholarly growth, and positive outcomes from their publishing experience. The methods of data gathering undertaken for this study may be instructive for others contemplating a similar evaluation of their press's value. Specifically, the survey described herein aimed to measure the value of the press in the view of one of its primary stakeholders—its authors—and similarly designed surveys could measure the value of the press in the view of other important stakeholders. Important implications for the press's practices and future avenues of research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44613,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","volume":"7 1","pages":"225 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/JSP.50.4.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:University presses publish works of scholarly, intellectual, or creative merit tailored to an audience of specialists or a group with a shared interest. They also connect their host institution to local and regional communities and generate positive publicity for the institution. In recent years, however, university presses have faced increased scrutiny for myriad financial reasons. The purpose of this study was to measure the extrinsic and intrinsic value of one university press by gathering multiple sources of data on productivity, academic reach, and peer comparisons. Additionally, many of the press's recently published authors completed an anonymous online survey about their experiences, preferences, and satisfaction with aspects of the publishing process. Despite the press's recent financial struggles, the results of this study showed evidence of the press's benefits and value, and authors who responded to the survey reported high rates of satisfaction, personal and scholarly growth, and positive outcomes from their publishing experience. The methods of data gathering undertaken for this study may be instructive for others contemplating a similar evaluation of their press's value. Specifically, the survey described herein aimed to measure the value of the press in the view of one of its primary stakeholders—its authors—and similarly designed surveys could measure the value of the press in the view of other important stakeholders. Important implications for the press's practices and future avenues of research are discussed.
衡量高校出版社价值与影响力的探索性研究
摘要:大学出版社出版学术、智力或创造性的作品,为专家读者或有共同兴趣的群体量身定制。他们还将主办机构与当地和区域社区联系起来,并为该机构带来正面宣传。然而,近年来,由于各种各样的财务原因,大学出版社面临着越来越多的审查。本研究的目的是通过收集有关生产力、学术影响力和同行比较的多个数据来源来衡量一家大学出版社的外在和内在价值。此外,许多出版社最近出版的作者完成了一项关于他们的经历、偏好和出版过程满意度的匿名在线调查。尽管出版业最近的财政困难,但这项研究的结果显示了出版业的利益和价值,参与调查的作者报告了很高的满意度,个人和学术成长,以及他们出版经历的积极成果。本研究采用的数据收集方法可能对其他正在考虑对其媒体价值进行类似评估的人具有指导意义。具体来说,本文所描述的调查旨在衡量新闻界在其主要利益相关者之一(其作者)眼中的价值,而类似设计的调查可以衡量新闻界在其他重要利益相关者眼中的价值。讨论了对新闻实践和未来研究途径的重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: For more than 40 years, the Journal of Scholarly Publishing has been the authoritative voice of academic publishing. The journal combines philosophical analysis with practical advice and aspires to explain, argue, discuss, and question the large collection of new topics that continually arise in the publishing field. JSP has also examined the future of scholarly publishing, scholarship on the web, digitization, copyright, editorial policies, computer applications, marketing, and pricing models. It is the indispensable resource for academics and publishers that addresses the new challenges resulting from changes in technology and funding and from innovations in production and publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信