Farmers' Implementation of Integrated Pest Management (Ipm) Methods for The Onion Crop in The Qutour District- Gharbiah Governorate: تنفيذ الزراع لأساليب المكافحة المتكاملة لآفات محصول البصل بمركز قطور محافظة الغربية

Hamza Hamed Abdallah, Alaa Mohamed Elkawa, Saber Mohamed Hamza Hamed Abdallah, Alaa Mohamed Elkawa, Saber M
{"title":"Farmers' Implementation of Integrated Pest Management (Ipm) Methods for The Onion Crop in The Qutour District- Gharbiah Governorate: تنفيذ الزراع لأساليب المكافحة المتكاملة لآفات محصول البصل بمركز قطور محافظة الغربية","authors":"Hamza Hamed Abdallah, Alaa Mohamed Elkawa, Saber Mohamed Hamza Hamed Abdallah, Alaa Mohamed Elkawa, Saber M","doi":"10.26389/ajsrp.m230122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to identify the level of farmers' implementation of integrated pest management (IPM) methods for the onion crop in the Qutour district- Gharbiah governorate, determining the contribution of independent variables which have a correlation relationship in explaining the variation in the degree of their implementation of these methods, identifying the indicative methods preferred by the respondents in order to obtain their knowledge in this field, and identifying the reasons for not implementing these methods.This research was conducted in Gharbiah Governorate, as it is one of the largest governorates of the Republic for the cultivation of the onion crop (49981 Faddans), and with the same criterion, Qutour district (10,235 Faddans) was selected. From it, three villages were selected randomly; they were the villages of Abu Gendi, Samla, and Al-Haramlah. This was followed by selection of a regular random sample represents 10% of the farmers in three selected villages. So the sample size was amounted to 179 respondents. The statistical methods which used in data analysis and presentation of the results were: frequencies, percentages, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, Pearson's simple correlation coefficient, model of multiple regression correlation analysis (step-wise). The most important results were as follows: 1- 60.3% of the respondents have an moderate level of implementation of recommendations related to agricultural control, 77.7% of them have an moderate level of implementation of recommendations related to chemical control, about 51% of them have an moderate level of implementation of recommendations related to mechanical control, and approximately 70% of them have a low level of implementation of the recommendations related to biological control. 2- The most important variables contributed in explaining the variation in the dependent variable were: the number of years of experience in the cultivation of the onion crop, the educational status of the respondent, the average production of the Faddan of the onion crop, the degree of exposure to agricultural information sources, satisfaction with the economic return from the cultivation of the onion crop, the degree of Availability of extension services, purpose of cultivation, and Attitude towards agricultural extension. 3-The most methods preferred by the respondents were: field and office visits, panels, extension meetings and extension fields, while the least ranked ways in the respondents’ preference were extension publications, the Internet, and home visits. 4-It was found that the respondents’ lack of knowledge with these recommendations and the high prices of their application, low onion prices, and low role of the agricultural extension in applying these recommendations were the most important reasons for not implementing these methods.","PeriodicalId":14863,"journal":{"name":"Journal of agricultural, environmental and veterinary sciences","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of agricultural, environmental and veterinary sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26389/ajsrp.m230122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aimed to identify the level of farmers' implementation of integrated pest management (IPM) methods for the onion crop in the Qutour district- Gharbiah governorate, determining the contribution of independent variables which have a correlation relationship in explaining the variation in the degree of their implementation of these methods, identifying the indicative methods preferred by the respondents in order to obtain their knowledge in this field, and identifying the reasons for not implementing these methods.This research was conducted in Gharbiah Governorate, as it is one of the largest governorates of the Republic for the cultivation of the onion crop (49981 Faddans), and with the same criterion, Qutour district (10,235 Faddans) was selected. From it, three villages were selected randomly; they were the villages of Abu Gendi, Samla, and Al-Haramlah. This was followed by selection of a regular random sample represents 10% of the farmers in three selected villages. So the sample size was amounted to 179 respondents. The statistical methods which used in data analysis and presentation of the results were: frequencies, percentages, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, Pearson's simple correlation coefficient, model of multiple regression correlation analysis (step-wise). The most important results were as follows: 1- 60.3% of the respondents have an moderate level of implementation of recommendations related to agricultural control, 77.7% of them have an moderate level of implementation of recommendations related to chemical control, about 51% of them have an moderate level of implementation of recommendations related to mechanical control, and approximately 70% of them have a low level of implementation of the recommendations related to biological control. 2- The most important variables contributed in explaining the variation in the dependent variable were: the number of years of experience in the cultivation of the onion crop, the educational status of the respondent, the average production of the Faddan of the onion crop, the degree of exposure to agricultural information sources, satisfaction with the economic return from the cultivation of the onion crop, the degree of Availability of extension services, purpose of cultivation, and Attitude towards agricultural extension. 3-The most methods preferred by the respondents were: field and office visits, panels, extension meetings and extension fields, while the least ranked ways in the respondents’ preference were extension publications, the Internet, and home visits. 4-It was found that the respondents’ lack of knowledge with these recommendations and the high prices of their application, low onion prices, and low role of the agricultural extension in applying these recommendations were the most important reasons for not implementing these methods.
“农业对西方国家区域合作伙伴关系”:在西部省卡塔尔中心实施综合防治洋葱虫害的方法
本研究旨在确定Qutour地区- Gharbiah省农民对洋葱作物实施有害生物综合治理(IPM)方法的水平,确定在解释他们实施这些方法的程度变化方面具有相关关系的自变量的贡献,确定受访者为获得该领域知识而首选的指示性方法。并找出没有实现这些方法的原因。这项研究是在Gharbiah省进行的,因为它是共和国种植洋葱作物最大的省份之一(49981法丹),并以同样的标准选择了Qutour区(10,235法丹)。从中随机抽取3个村庄;分别是阿布简迪村、萨姆拉村和哈拉姆拉村。随后,在三个选定的村庄中选择一个代表10%农民的常规随机样本。因此,样本量为179人。数据分析和结果呈现的统计方法有:频率、百分比、算术平均值、标准差、Pearson简单相关系数、多元回归相关分析模型(逐步)。最重要的结果如下:1 - 60.3%的受访者有中度的实现与农业相关的建议控制,77.7%的人有一个适度的化学防治相关实施建议,约有51%的人一个中等水平的实现相关的建议机械控制,其中大约70%有一个低水平的生物防治相关实施建议。2-解释因变量变化的最重要变量是:种植洋葱作物的年数、被调查者的教育程度、洋葱作物的平均产量、对农业信息来源的接触程度、对种植洋葱作物的经济回报的满意度、推广服务的可获得程度、种植目的、对农业推广的态度。受访者最喜欢的方法是:实地和办公室访问,小组,扩展会议和扩展领域,而在受访者的偏好中排名最低的方式是扩展出版物,互联网和家访。调查发现,受访者对这些建议缺乏了解,其应用价格高,洋葱价格低,农业推广在应用这些建议方面的作用低,是不实施这些方法的最重要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信