Excess Death Rates for Republicans and Democrats During the COVID-19 Pandemic

J. Wallace, Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham, Jason C. Schwartz
{"title":"Excess Death Rates for Republicans and Democrats During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"J. Wallace, Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham, Jason C. Schwartz","doi":"10.3386/w30512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political affiliation has emerged as a potential risk factor for COVID-19, amid evidence that Republican-leaning counties have had higher COVID-19 death rates than Democrat-leaning counties and evidence of a link between political party affiliation and vaccination views. This study constructs an individual-level dataset with political affiliation and excess death rates during the COVID-19 pandemic via a linkage of 2017 voter registration in Ohio and Florida to mortality data from 2018 to 2021. We estimate substantially higher excess death rates for registered Republicans when compared to registered Democrats, with almost all of the difference concentrated in the period after vaccines were widely available in our study states. Overall, the excess death rate for Republicans was 5.4 percentage points (pp), or 76%, higher than the excess death rate for Democrats. Post-vaccines, the excess death rate gap between Republicans and Democrats widened from 1.6 pp (22% of the Democrat excess death rate) to 10.4 pp (153% of the Democrat excess death rate). The gap in excess death rates between Republicans and Democrats is concentrated in counties with low vaccination rates and only materializes after vaccines became widely available.","PeriodicalId":84011,"journal":{"name":"Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research)","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/w30512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Political affiliation has emerged as a potential risk factor for COVID-19, amid evidence that Republican-leaning counties have had higher COVID-19 death rates than Democrat-leaning counties and evidence of a link between political party affiliation and vaccination views. This study constructs an individual-level dataset with political affiliation and excess death rates during the COVID-19 pandemic via a linkage of 2017 voter registration in Ohio and Florida to mortality data from 2018 to 2021. We estimate substantially higher excess death rates for registered Republicans when compared to registered Democrats, with almost all of the difference concentrated in the period after vaccines were widely available in our study states. Overall, the excess death rate for Republicans was 5.4 percentage points (pp), or 76%, higher than the excess death rate for Democrats. Post-vaccines, the excess death rate gap between Republicans and Democrats widened from 1.6 pp (22% of the Democrat excess death rate) to 10.4 pp (153% of the Democrat excess death rate). The gap in excess death rates between Republicans and Democrats is concentrated in counties with low vaccination rates and only materializes after vaccines became widely available.
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间共和党人和民主党人的超额死亡率
有证据表明,倾向共和党的县比倾向民主党的县的COVID-19死亡率更高,而且有证据表明,政党倾向与疫苗接种观点之间存在联系,因此,政治派别已成为COVID-19的潜在风险因素。本研究通过将2017年俄亥俄州和佛罗里达州的选民登记与2018年至2021年的死亡率数据联系起来,构建了一个包含2019冠状病毒病大流行期间政治派别和超额死亡率的个人层面数据集。我们估计,与登记的民主党人相比,登记的共和党人的超额死亡率要高得多,几乎所有的差异都集中在我们研究州广泛接种疫苗之后的时期。总体而言,共和党人的超额死亡率为5.4个百分点,即76%,高于民主党人的超额死亡率。接种疫苗后,共和党和民主党之间的超额死亡率差距从1.6个百分点(民主党超额死亡率的22%)扩大到10.4个百分点(民主党超额死亡率的153%)。共和党和民主党在高死亡率上的差距主要集中在疫苗接种率较低的县,只有在疫苗广泛普及后才会显现出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信