Cyst‐based ecotoxicological tests using Anostracans: Comparison of two species of Streptocephalus

A. Crisinei, L. Delaunay, D. Rossel, J. Tarradellas, H. Meyer, H. Saïah, P. Vogel, C. Delisle, C. Blaise
{"title":"Cyst‐based ecotoxicological tests using Anostracans: Comparison of two species of Streptocephalus","authors":"A. Crisinei, L. Delaunay, D. Rossel, J. Tarradellas, H. Meyer, H. Saïah, P. Vogel, C. Delisle, C. Blaise","doi":"10.1002/TOX.2530090411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cyst-based ecotoxicological tests are simple and low-cost methods for assessing acute toxicity. Nevertheless, only a few comparative studies on their sensitivity are known. In the present study, the suitability of the use of two freshwater Anostracan species, Streptocephalus rubricaudatus and S. texanus, was assessed. The impact of 16 priority pollutants (4 heavy metals, 11 organic, and 1 organometallic compounds) on these two species, as well as on Artemia salina (Artoxkit M), Daphnia magna (International Organization for Standardization 6341), and S. proboscideus (Streptoxkit F) was assessed. For indicative comparison, bioassays using Brachionus calyciflorus (Rotoxkit F) and Photobacterium phosphoreum (Microtox) were also performed. \n \n \n \nFor heavy metals (K2Cr2O7, Cd2+, Zn2+, Cu2+), the sensitivity of the two studied Streptocephalus species was slightly higher than that of D. magna. It was significantly more elevated than for the marine A. salina. For organic and organometallic micropollutants [phenol, 3,5-dichlorophenol, pentachlorophenol (PCP), hydroquinone, linear alkylbenzene sulfonate, sodium dodecyl sulfate, tributylphosphate, dimethylphthalate, atrazine, lindane, malathion, tributyltin chloride (TBT-CI)], the sensitivity of the 4 anostracan species was of the same order of magnitude as that of D. magna. Artemia salina was slightly less sensitive to some organic compounds (PCP, hydroquinone, TBT-CI). \n \n \n \nThe sensitivity of S. rubricaudatus to organic solvents was low. On the other hand, this anostracan was quite sensitive to NaCI. Thus, its use is restricted to freshwater samples. \n \n \n \nThe evaluation of global practicability of these two tests confirms that cyst-based freshwater anostracans may be used to perform low-cost tests at a sensitivity comparable to that of D. magna (24 h immobilization test). © 1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc..","PeriodicalId":11824,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology & Water Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology & Water Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/TOX.2530090411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Cyst-based ecotoxicological tests are simple and low-cost methods for assessing acute toxicity. Nevertheless, only a few comparative studies on their sensitivity are known. In the present study, the suitability of the use of two freshwater Anostracan species, Streptocephalus rubricaudatus and S. texanus, was assessed. The impact of 16 priority pollutants (4 heavy metals, 11 organic, and 1 organometallic compounds) on these two species, as well as on Artemia salina (Artoxkit M), Daphnia magna (International Organization for Standardization 6341), and S. proboscideus (Streptoxkit F) was assessed. For indicative comparison, bioassays using Brachionus calyciflorus (Rotoxkit F) and Photobacterium phosphoreum (Microtox) were also performed. For heavy metals (K2Cr2O7, Cd2+, Zn2+, Cu2+), the sensitivity of the two studied Streptocephalus species was slightly higher than that of D. magna. It was significantly more elevated than for the marine A. salina. For organic and organometallic micropollutants [phenol, 3,5-dichlorophenol, pentachlorophenol (PCP), hydroquinone, linear alkylbenzene sulfonate, sodium dodecyl sulfate, tributylphosphate, dimethylphthalate, atrazine, lindane, malathion, tributyltin chloride (TBT-CI)], the sensitivity of the 4 anostracan species was of the same order of magnitude as that of D. magna. Artemia salina was slightly less sensitive to some organic compounds (PCP, hydroquinone, TBT-CI). The sensitivity of S. rubricaudatus to organic solvents was low. On the other hand, this anostracan was quite sensitive to NaCI. Thus, its use is restricted to freshwater samples. The evaluation of global practicability of these two tests confirms that cyst-based freshwater anostracans may be used to perform low-cost tests at a sensitivity comparable to that of D. magna (24 h immobilization test). © 1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
用Anostracans进行基于囊肿的生态毒理学试验:两种链头虫的比较
基于囊肿的生态毒理学试验是评估急性毒性的简单和低成本的方法。然而,对其敏感性的比较研究却很少。本研究对两种淡水肛肠目动物红链头(Streptocephalus rubricaudatus)和S. texanus的适宜性进行了评价。评估了16种重点污染物(4种重金属、11种有机化合物和1种有机金属化合物)对这两个物种的影响,以及对Artemia salina (Artoxkit M)、Daphnia magna (International Organization for Standardization, 6341)和S. proboscideus (Streptoxkit F)的影响。为了进行指示性比较,还进行了花萼臂轮虫(Rotoxkit F)和磷光细菌(Microtox)的生物测定。对重金属(K2Cr2O7、Cd2+、Zn2+、Cu2+)的敏感性均略高于D. magna。它明显高于海洋A. salina。对有机和金属有机微污染物[苯酚、3,5-二氯苯酚、五氯苯酚(PCP)、对苯二酚、烷基苯磺酸钠、十二烷基硫酸钠、磷酸三丁酯、邻苯二甲酸二甲酯、阿特拉津、林丹、马拉硫磷、三丁基氯化锡(tpt - ci)]的敏感性,4种anostracan与D. magna具有相同的数量级。盐渍蒿对某些有机化合物(PCP、对苯二酚、TBT-CI)的敏感性略低。红桃对有机溶剂的敏感性较低。另一方面,该anostranus对NaCI非常敏感。因此,它的使用仅限于淡水样品。对这两种测试的全球实用性的评估证实,以囊为基础的淡水anstracans可用于进行低成本测试,其灵敏度与D. magna(24小时固定试验)相当。©1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信