Comparative characteristics of the physical and mechanical properties of the self-etchangeable self-adhesive composite cement for indirect restorations "Maxcem Elite TM"

Q2 Dentistry
M. Sorokhan, O. B. Byelikov
{"title":"Comparative characteristics of the physical and mechanical properties of the self-etchangeable self-adhesive composite cement for indirect restorations \"Maxcem Elite TM\"","authors":"M. Sorokhan, O. B. Byelikov","doi":"10.11603/2311-9624.2022.1.12955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary. The article deals with an actual problem of orthopedic dentistry: the choice of a reliable material for fixing indirect restorations by comparing the physical and mechanical properties of self-adhesive self-etching composite cements. \nThe aim of the study – to carry out a comparative analysis of self-etching self-adhesive double-fixation cements for indirect restorations in terms of physical and mechanical properties. \nMaterials and Methods. For comparison, in terms of physical and mechanical parameters, a self-etching self-adhesive composite cement for indirect restorations \"Maxcem Elite\", Kerr, California, USA was taken. \"Maxcem Elite\" refers to self-etching self-adhesive composite cements of double fixation, which has a number of positive qualities, such as high physical and mechanical properties, good aesthetic properties, radiopacity. We analyzed the following physical and mechanical parameters: the appearance of the paste, depth of hardening, mm, diametric strength, MPa, conical yield point according to Heppler, MPa, hardness according to Heppler, MPa, water absorption in 7 days, μg/mm3, water solubility in 7 days μg/mm3, adhesive strength, MPa, peel strength, MPa. \nResults and Discussion. According to the average test depth of hardening (mm) material \"Maxcem Elite\" is inferior to others: material Bifix QV by 14.9 % and Relyx U 100 by 13.3 %. This does not significantly affect the quality of the connection of the adhesive structure with the hard tissues of the tooth, especially due to the method we have developed for the preparation of abutment teeth in the manufacturing of adhesive pads. On the other hand, according to the average value of the index of diametrical strength (MPa), the studied material \"Maxcem Elite\" is by 17.2 % better than Bifix QV, and by 17.3 % better than Relyx U 100. Comparing these and other physical and mechanical properties of materials on average, one must bear in mind the random nature of these values. From the results of the study, it can be seen that the difference between the indicators of the Maxcem Elite material and analogues is confirmed at a very high level of significance. The study of the level of water absorption indicates the probable absence of variability of the indicator of the studied material in comparison with comparable analogs. The value of the water solubility index of all the composites under study practically does not differ from the value of \"Maxcem Elite\" (within (2.5±0.1) %), and corresponds to the requirements of ISO 4046. \nConclusions. The research results show that the investigated composite material \"Maxcem Elite\" in the main parameters corresponds to analogs, in most of the indicators it combines their best characteristics. In it, the adhesive strength of the connection with the hard tissues of the tooth is noticeably enhanced and better peel strength makes it possible to profitably use this material \"Maxcem Elite\" for fixing the adhesive structures.","PeriodicalId":35793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Dentistry","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11603/2311-9624.2022.1.12955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary. The article deals with an actual problem of orthopedic dentistry: the choice of a reliable material for fixing indirect restorations by comparing the physical and mechanical properties of self-adhesive self-etching composite cements. The aim of the study – to carry out a comparative analysis of self-etching self-adhesive double-fixation cements for indirect restorations in terms of physical and mechanical properties. Materials and Methods. For comparison, in terms of physical and mechanical parameters, a self-etching self-adhesive composite cement for indirect restorations "Maxcem Elite", Kerr, California, USA was taken. "Maxcem Elite" refers to self-etching self-adhesive composite cements of double fixation, which has a number of positive qualities, such as high physical and mechanical properties, good aesthetic properties, radiopacity. We analyzed the following physical and mechanical parameters: the appearance of the paste, depth of hardening, mm, diametric strength, MPa, conical yield point according to Heppler, MPa, hardness according to Heppler, MPa, water absorption in 7 days, μg/mm3, water solubility in 7 days μg/mm3, adhesive strength, MPa, peel strength, MPa. Results and Discussion. According to the average test depth of hardening (mm) material "Maxcem Elite" is inferior to others: material Bifix QV by 14.9 % and Relyx U 100 by 13.3 %. This does not significantly affect the quality of the connection of the adhesive structure with the hard tissues of the tooth, especially due to the method we have developed for the preparation of abutment teeth in the manufacturing of adhesive pads. On the other hand, according to the average value of the index of diametrical strength (MPa), the studied material "Maxcem Elite" is by 17.2 % better than Bifix QV, and by 17.3 % better than Relyx U 100. Comparing these and other physical and mechanical properties of materials on average, one must bear in mind the random nature of these values. From the results of the study, it can be seen that the difference between the indicators of the Maxcem Elite material and analogues is confirmed at a very high level of significance. The study of the level of water absorption indicates the probable absence of variability of the indicator of the studied material in comparison with comparable analogs. The value of the water solubility index of all the composites under study practically does not differ from the value of "Maxcem Elite" (within (2.5±0.1) %), and corresponds to the requirements of ISO 4046. Conclusions. The research results show that the investigated composite material "Maxcem Elite" in the main parameters corresponds to analogs, in most of the indicators it combines their best characteristics. In it, the adhesive strength of the connection with the hard tissues of the tooth is noticeably enhanced and better peel strength makes it possible to profitably use this material "Maxcem Elite" for fixing the adhesive structures.
自固化自粘复合水泥间接修复体“Maxcem Elite TM”的物理力学性能比较
总结。本文通过比较自粘自蚀刻复合水泥的物理力学性能,探讨了骨科牙科的一个实际问题:选择一种可靠的材料用于间接修复体的固定。本研究的目的是对用于间接修复的自蚀刻自粘双固定水泥的物理和机械性能进行比较分析。材料与方法。为了比较,在物理和力学参数方面,采用了一种用于间接修复的自蚀刻自粘复合水泥“Maxcem Elite”,Kerr, California, USA。“Maxcem Elite”是指自蚀刻自粘复合胶合剂的双重固定,它具有许多积极的品质,如高的物理和机械性能,良好的美学性能,放射不透明度。我们分析了以下物理力学参数:膏体外观、硬化深度、mm、直径强度、MPa、圆锥体屈服点按Heppler、MPa、硬度按Heppler、MPa、吸水7天内μg/mm3、水溶性7天内μg/mm3、粘接强度、MPa、剥离强度、MPa。结果和讨论。根据平均试验硬化深度(mm),“Maxcem Elite”材料比其他材料:Bifix QV材料差14.9%,Relyx u100材料差13.3%。这不会显著影响粘接结构与牙齿硬组织的连接质量,特别是由于我们在制造粘接垫时开发了基牙制备方法。另一方面,根据直径强度指数(MPa)的平均值,所研究的材料Maxcem Elite比Bifix QV高17.2%,比Relyx u100高17.3%。平均比较这些和其他材料的物理和机械性能时,必须记住这些值的随机性。从研究结果可以看出,Maxcem Elite材料与类似物的各项指标之间的差异在非常高的显著性水平上得到了证实。对吸水水平的研究表明,与类似的类似物相比,所研究材料的指标可能没有可变性。所研究的所有复合材料的水溶性指数与“Maxcem Elite”的值几乎没有差异(在(2.5±0.1)%范围内),符合ISO 4046的要求。结论。研究结果表明,所研究的复合材料“Maxcem Elite”在主要参数上与类似物相对应,在大部分指标上结合了它们的最佳特性。在这种情况下,与牙齿硬组织连接的粘合强度明显增强,更好的剥离强度使得使用这种材料“Maxcem Elite”来固定粘合结构成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Dentistry
Journal of Clinical Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信