Progressive or problematic? A comparative analysis of media depictions of demands to defund the police

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
M. Craig, Jonathan C. Reid
{"title":"Progressive or problematic? A comparative analysis of media depictions of demands to defund the police","authors":"M. Craig, Jonathan C. Reid","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm-09-2021-0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe current study examines the media's depiction of demands to defund the police. Although this call to action has been a part of the public discourse for decades, the call has reached mainstream attention following the police-involved death of George Floyd in May 2020. Black Lives Matter, the American Civil Liberties Union, Color of Change, and other prominent organizations have endorsed this call. However, there is a lack of agreement on the “correct” meaning of this socio-political movement.Design/methodology/approachThe authors performed an inductive content analysis of the news articles using MaxQDA, a qualitative data analysis program. The authors focus on the text and its themes and patterns in the descriptions of #DefundThePolice, both implicit (e.g. tone) and explicit (e.g. defining the movement as problematic). The codes were further refined following open coding to fully develop the existing patterns. The results are organized by the themes within the articles. The findings also include direct quotes to reinforce the themes.FindingsIn the authors' content analysis of news reports, the authors find that the US and UK news outlets report definitions that parallel the M4BL's description of the movement. In this respect, media coverage reflected the basic tenets of the movement accurately as opposed to using definitions that misrepresent the group's primary objective. Although these sampled news articles generally adhered to the basic description of the defund movement, the authors found that the overall substance and tone of coverage varied across outlets. This divergence yielded five overarching themes that included: the involvement of corporate America in the defunding debate, the frequent use of opinion pieces, mentions of history for informing the debate, the inclusion of the police perspective, and reporting that seemed to tie the defund movement to increases in violent crime.Originality/valueThis article explores how the mass media reports and defines the #DefundThePolice movement. Although much debate surrounds this issue, there is limited understanding of the mainstream news media's depiction of the movement. The current study addresses this research gap and informs the defunding debate by examining whether media descriptions of the movement coincide with the Movement for Black Lives benchmark delineation.","PeriodicalId":47881,"journal":{"name":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-09-2021-0124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

PurposeThe current study examines the media's depiction of demands to defund the police. Although this call to action has been a part of the public discourse for decades, the call has reached mainstream attention following the police-involved death of George Floyd in May 2020. Black Lives Matter, the American Civil Liberties Union, Color of Change, and other prominent organizations have endorsed this call. However, there is a lack of agreement on the “correct” meaning of this socio-political movement.Design/methodology/approachThe authors performed an inductive content analysis of the news articles using MaxQDA, a qualitative data analysis program. The authors focus on the text and its themes and patterns in the descriptions of #DefundThePolice, both implicit (e.g. tone) and explicit (e.g. defining the movement as problematic). The codes were further refined following open coding to fully develop the existing patterns. The results are organized by the themes within the articles. The findings also include direct quotes to reinforce the themes.FindingsIn the authors' content analysis of news reports, the authors find that the US and UK news outlets report definitions that parallel the M4BL's description of the movement. In this respect, media coverage reflected the basic tenets of the movement accurately as opposed to using definitions that misrepresent the group's primary objective. Although these sampled news articles generally adhered to the basic description of the defund movement, the authors found that the overall substance and tone of coverage varied across outlets. This divergence yielded five overarching themes that included: the involvement of corporate America in the defunding debate, the frequent use of opinion pieces, mentions of history for informing the debate, the inclusion of the police perspective, and reporting that seemed to tie the defund movement to increases in violent crime.Originality/valueThis article explores how the mass media reports and defines the #DefundThePolice movement. Although much debate surrounds this issue, there is limited understanding of the mainstream news media's depiction of the movement. The current study addresses this research gap and informs the defunding debate by examining whether media descriptions of the movement coincide with the Movement for Black Lives benchmark delineation.
进步还是问题?媒体对撤资要求的描述的比较分析
目的:本研究考察了媒体对警察撤资要求的描述。尽管这一行动呼吁几十年来一直是公共话语的一部分,但在2020年5月乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)涉警死亡后,这一呼吁才引起了主流关注。“黑人的命也重要”、美国公民自由联盟、“改变的颜色”和其他著名组织都支持这一呼吁。然而,人们对这场社会政治运动的“正确”含义缺乏共识。设计/方法/方法作者使用定性数据分析程序MaxQDA对新闻文章进行归纳性内容分析。作者关注#DefundThePolice的文本及其主题和模式,包括隐含的(例如语气)和明确的(例如将运动定义为有问题的)。这些代码按照开放编码进行了进一步细化,以完全开发现有的模式。结果按文章中的主题进行组织。调查结果还包括直接引用来强化主题。在作者对新闻报道的内容分析中,作者发现美国和英国新闻媒体报道的定义与M4BL对该运动的描述相似。在这方面,媒体报道准确地反映了该运动的基本原则,而不是使用歪曲该组织主要目标的定义。尽管这些抽样的新闻文章普遍坚持对撤资运动的基本描述,但作者发现,各媒体报道的总体内容和语气各不相同。这种分歧产生了五个主要主题,包括:美国企业参与撤资辩论,频繁使用观点文章,在辩论中提到历史,包括警察的观点,以及似乎将撤资运动与暴力犯罪的增加联系起来的报道。原创性/价值本文探讨大众媒体如何报道和定义#撤除警察运动。尽管围绕这一问题有很多争论,但人们对主流新闻媒体对这一运动的描述理解有限。目前的研究解决了这一研究差距,并通过检查媒体对该运动的描述是否与“黑人生活运动”的基准描述相吻合,为撤资辩论提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: ■Community policing ■Managerial styles and leadership ■Performance measurement and accountability ■Pursuit guidelines ■Crime trends and analysis ■Crisis negotiation ■Civil disorder ■Organized crime ■Victimology ■Crime prevention ■Career development ■High risk police activities ■Routine policing ■Traffic enforcement ■Civil litigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信