Effects of Growth on Polychaete Rockworm, Marphysa sanguinea Integrated Culture with Olive Flounder, Paralichythys olivaceus in Flow Through System

Hossein Par, avar, Mizanur Rahman, Phoo War War, Chang-hoon Kim
{"title":"Effects of Growth on Polychaete Rockworm, Marphysa sanguinea Integrated Culture with Olive Flounder, Paralichythys olivaceus in Flow Through System","authors":"Hossein Par, avar, Mizanur Rahman, Phoo War War, Chang-hoon Kim","doi":"10.4172/2155-9546.1000558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three experiments were designed to determine the appropriate size and density for optimum growth and survival of rockworm polychaete Marphysa sanguinea integrated culture with olive flounder Paralichythys olivaceus in the flowthrough system under controlled laboratory condition over a 13-week period. The experimental design in T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 for Experiment-1(<0.5 g) was 200, 400, 800, 400 and 400 worms for Experiment-2 (<0.5-1.5 g) was 100, 200, 400, 200 and 200 worms and for Experiment-3 (1.5-2.5 g) was 50, 100, 200, 100 and 100 worms respectively. The worm feed of T1, T2 and T3 was feces of fish and uneaten feed; that of T4 was controlled-no feed and that of T5 was commercial feed. The polychaete worms were kept in 15 boxes (L50 × W40 × H30 cm), and bottoms of the boxes were filled with a 15~20 cm layer of substrate sediment with 50% gravel and 50% oyster shell. Thirty fishes were placed in each cubic tank (L70 × W40 × H20 cm) with 55 L water. The weight gain of rockworms (<0.5 g) in T1, T2 and T3 for Experiment-1 (<0.5 g) has shown 152.7%, 153.8%, and 140.3%, respectively. The weight gain was higher than in the other two groups, as the weight gain of rockworms in T1, T2 and T3 for Experiment-2 (0.5-1.5 g) was 51%, 30%, and 46%, respectively, and that of rockworms for Experiment-3 (<1.5-2.5 g), that is, 75%, 73% and 62%, respectively. From this result, it can be concluded that in the flow through system a small size (< 0.5 g) group of rockworms can be one of the most suitable species at the density of 2000-4000 inds.m on fish feces and uneaten feed, as they can grow better than 0.5-1.5 g and 1.5-2.5 g rockworms. On the other hand, integrated results have indicated that in the flow through system around 8 g olive flounder fish was an excellent candidate to be associated with 0.5-1.5 g worms, which can grow better than a small size (< 0.5 g) group of rockworms and then 1.5-2.5 g worms at the optimum density 1000-2000 indv.m-2 polychaetes","PeriodicalId":15243,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development","volume":"23 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9546.1000558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Three experiments were designed to determine the appropriate size and density for optimum growth and survival of rockworm polychaete Marphysa sanguinea integrated culture with olive flounder Paralichythys olivaceus in the flowthrough system under controlled laboratory condition over a 13-week period. The experimental design in T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 for Experiment-1(<0.5 g) was 200, 400, 800, 400 and 400 worms for Experiment-2 (<0.5-1.5 g) was 100, 200, 400, 200 and 200 worms and for Experiment-3 (1.5-2.5 g) was 50, 100, 200, 100 and 100 worms respectively. The worm feed of T1, T2 and T3 was feces of fish and uneaten feed; that of T4 was controlled-no feed and that of T5 was commercial feed. The polychaete worms were kept in 15 boxes (L50 × W40 × H30 cm), and bottoms of the boxes were filled with a 15~20 cm layer of substrate sediment with 50% gravel and 50% oyster shell. Thirty fishes were placed in each cubic tank (L70 × W40 × H20 cm) with 55 L water. The weight gain of rockworms (<0.5 g) in T1, T2 and T3 for Experiment-1 (<0.5 g) has shown 152.7%, 153.8%, and 140.3%, respectively. The weight gain was higher than in the other two groups, as the weight gain of rockworms in T1, T2 and T3 for Experiment-2 (0.5-1.5 g) was 51%, 30%, and 46%, respectively, and that of rockworms for Experiment-3 (<1.5-2.5 g), that is, 75%, 73% and 62%, respectively. From this result, it can be concluded that in the flow through system a small size (< 0.5 g) group of rockworms can be one of the most suitable species at the density of 2000-4000 inds.m on fish feces and uneaten feed, as they can grow better than 0.5-1.5 g and 1.5-2.5 g rockworms. On the other hand, integrated results have indicated that in the flow through system around 8 g olive flounder fish was an excellent candidate to be associated with 0.5-1.5 g worms, which can grow better than a small size (< 0.5 g) group of rockworms and then 1.5-2.5 g worms at the optimum density 1000-2000 indv.m-2 polychaetes
通流系统对多毛岩虫、血麻麻与橄榄比目鱼、橄榄副鱼生长的影响
为确定多毛岩虫与橄榄比目鱼(palichythys olivaceus)在流动系统中生长和存活的最佳尺寸和密度,设计了3个实验,为期13周。实验1(<0.5 g)在T1、T2、T3、T4和T5的试验设计分别为200、400、800、400和400条虫,实验2 (<0.5 ~ 1.5 g)的试验设计分别为100、200、400、200和200条虫,实验3 (1.5 ~ 2.5 g)的试验设计分别为50、100、200、100和100条虫。T1、T2和T3的虫食为鱼的粪便和未吃的饲料;T4为控制无饲料,T5为商品饲料。多毛类蠕虫饲养于15个箱体(L50 × W40 × H30 cm)中,箱体底部填充15~20 cm的底泥,底泥中50%为砾石,50%为牡蛎壳。每立方缸(L70 × W40 × H20 cm)中放入30尾鱼,水55 L。试验1 (<0.5 g)在T1、T2和T3的岩虫增重分别为152.7%、153.8%和140.3%。试验-2 (0.5 ~ 1.5 g)在T1、T2和T3的增重分别为51%、30%和46%,试验-3 (<1.5 ~ 2.5 g)的增重分别为75%、73%和62%,增重幅度高于其他两组。由此可以得出结论,在流动系统中,2000-4000只密度的小尺寸(< 0.5 g)岩虫群是最合适的物种之一。M依靠鱼粪和未吃过的饲料,因为它们能长出比0.5-1.5克和1.5-2.5克更好的岩虫。另一方面,综合结果表明,在流动系统中,8 g左右的橄榄比目鱼是0.5-1.5 g蠕虫的最佳选择,其生长效果优于小尺寸(< 0.5 g)的岩虫群,然后在最佳密度为1.5-2.5 g时生长1000-2000只。m - 2多毛类
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信