The Effect of Augmentation with a Posterior Fixation Suture in Superior Rectus Transposition for Abducens Nerve Palsy

Mingyu Si, Xinxiang Shao
{"title":"The Effect of Augmentation with a Posterior Fixation Suture in Superior Rectus Transposition for Abducens Nerve Palsy","authors":"Mingyu Si, Xinxiang Shao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo investigate the effect and complications of augmentation with a posterior fixation suture in superior rectus transposition (SRT) for abducens nerve palsy. \n \n \nMethods: \nTwo groups of patients with abducens nerve palsy treated with either SRT combined with a posterior fixation suture (A-SRT group, n=10) or SRT (SRT group, n=11) were analyzed retrospectively from March 2014 to January 2019 in Xuzhou No.1 People's Hospital. Changes in esotropia, vertical deviation, cyclotropia, and improvements in abduction and adduction limitation were compared between the two groups. The follow-up time was 10-12 months. The data were analyzed by a Wilcoxon rank sum test and Mann-Whitney test. \n \n \nResults: \nThere were significant differences between the A-SRT and SRT groups in esotropia (Z=-2.940, P<0.001) and abduction limitation (Z=-3.272, P=0.001). The variations in esotropia were 40.0° (36.0°-45.0°) in the A-SRT group and 28.0° (25.0°-30.0°) in the SRT group and the variations in abduction limitation were 2.0 (1.0-2.0) and 1.0 (1.0-1.0), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in adduction limitation (Z=-1.855, P=0.064) or vertical deviation (Z=-1.505, P=0.132). There was a significant difference between the two groups in the variation of subjective in cyclotropia inspected by adouble Maddox rod (Z=-2.228, P=0.026). There was an incyclotorsional shift of 3.0° (0.0°-4.25°) in the A-SRT group and 0.0° (0.0°-2.0°) in the SRT group. But there were no complaints of rotational or vertical discomfort in either group. \n \n \nConclusion: \nIn augmentation with a posterior fixation suture in SRT for abducens nerve palsy, although there is a possibility of slight in cyclotropia or adduction limitation, abduction limitation was optimally corrected and the correction of esotropic deviation in the primary position was perfect without any obvious subjective complaints of vertical or torsional diplopia. \n \n \nKey words: \nposterior fixation suture; superior rectus transposition; abducent nerve palsy; cyclotropia; vertical deviation","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"11 4 1","pages":"849-854"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.11.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect and complications of augmentation with a posterior fixation suture in superior rectus transposition (SRT) for abducens nerve palsy. Methods: Two groups of patients with abducens nerve palsy treated with either SRT combined with a posterior fixation suture (A-SRT group, n=10) or SRT (SRT group, n=11) were analyzed retrospectively from March 2014 to January 2019 in Xuzhou No.1 People's Hospital. Changes in esotropia, vertical deviation, cyclotropia, and improvements in abduction and adduction limitation were compared between the two groups. The follow-up time was 10-12 months. The data were analyzed by a Wilcoxon rank sum test and Mann-Whitney test. Results: There were significant differences between the A-SRT and SRT groups in esotropia (Z=-2.940, P<0.001) and abduction limitation (Z=-3.272, P=0.001). The variations in esotropia were 40.0° (36.0°-45.0°) in the A-SRT group and 28.0° (25.0°-30.0°) in the SRT group and the variations in abduction limitation were 2.0 (1.0-2.0) and 1.0 (1.0-1.0), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in adduction limitation (Z=-1.855, P=0.064) or vertical deviation (Z=-1.505, P=0.132). There was a significant difference between the two groups in the variation of subjective in cyclotropia inspected by adouble Maddox rod (Z=-2.228, P=0.026). There was an incyclotorsional shift of 3.0° (0.0°-4.25°) in the A-SRT group and 0.0° (0.0°-2.0°) in the SRT group. But there were no complaints of rotational or vertical discomfort in either group. Conclusion: In augmentation with a posterior fixation suture in SRT for abducens nerve palsy, although there is a possibility of slight in cyclotropia or adduction limitation, abduction limitation was optimally corrected and the correction of esotropic deviation in the primary position was perfect without any obvious subjective complaints of vertical or torsional diplopia. Key words: posterior fixation suture; superior rectus transposition; abducent nerve palsy; cyclotropia; vertical deviation
后固定缝线增强上直肌转位治疗展神经麻痹的效果
目的:探讨后固定缝线增强上直肌转位术治疗外展神经麻痹的疗效及并发症。方法:回顾性分析2014年3月至2019年1月徐州市第一人民医院接受SRT联合后路固定缝线治疗的两组外展神经麻痹患者(a -SRT组,n=10)和SRT组(SRT组,n=11)。比较两组内斜视、垂直偏差、斜视的变化以及外展和内收限制的改善。随访10 ~ 12个月。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验和Mann-Whitney检验对数据进行分析。结果:A-SRT组和SRT组在内斜视(Z=-2.940, P<0.001)和外展限制(Z=-3.272, P=0.001)方面差异有统计学意义。内斜视的变化在A-SRT组为40.0°(36.0°-45.0°),在SRT组为28.0°(25.0°-30.0°),外展限制的变化分别为2.0°(1.0-2.0)和1.0°(1.0-1.0)。两组内收限制(Z=-1.855, P=0.064)和垂直偏差(Z=-1.505, P=0.132)差异无统计学意义。两组患者双Maddox棒检查主观斜视变化差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.228, P=0.026)。A-SRT组的环扭位移为3.0°(0.0°-4.25°),SRT组的环扭位移为0.0°(0.0°-2.0°)。但两组都没有人抱怨旋转或垂直不适。结论:SRT后固定缝线增强外展神经麻痹,虽然有轻微的斜视或内收受限的可能,但外展受限矫正效果较好,原发位内斜视矫正效果较好,无明显的垂直或扭转性复视主观性。关键词:后路固定缝合线;上直肌转位;展神经麻痹;cyclotropia;垂直偏差
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信