Physical Attributes of an Ultisol Under Different Uses in the North of Espírito Santo

IF 1.7 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jeniffer Ribeiro de Oliveira, Thais Santana do Nascimento, André Orlandi Nardoto Júnior, Wanderson Alves Ferreira, Alexandre Morais Borges, I. Gontijo, F. Pires, R. Bonomo, Dalila Bonomo Cosme, V. Lopes, Gabriel Barbosa da Cruz
{"title":"Physical Attributes of an Ultisol Under Different Uses in the North of Espírito Santo","authors":"Jeniffer Ribeiro de Oliveira, Thais Santana do Nascimento, André Orlandi Nardoto Júnior, Wanderson Alves Ferreira, Alexandre Morais Borges, I. Gontijo, F. Pires, R. Bonomo, Dalila Bonomo Cosme, V. Lopes, Gabriel Barbosa da Cruz","doi":"10.5539/jas.v15n4p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of the physical attributes of the soil is of fundamental importance for the understanding of the impacts caused by the different uses in the agricultural systems. In this sense, the objective of this work was to evaluate the changes in physical attributes of the soil in an area with different uses located in the north of Espírito Santo. The experiment followed a randomized block design (DBC), in a 4 × 2 factorial scheme, represented by 4 areas (coffee, fruit, pasture and native forest) and 2 depth classes (0-10 and 10-20 cm), resulting in a total of 8 treatments with 5 replications. The physical attributes evaluated were: texture, Ds (soil density); Dp (particle density); Ma (macroporosity); Mi (microporosity) and Pt (total porosity). The data obtained were submitted to analysis of variance and the comparison of means was performed using the Tukey test at 5%, using the statistical program R© 4.2. Then, the physical attributes data were grouped into a similarity dendrogram, using the Euclidean distance method. The area with native forest presented the best physical attributes of the soil, followed by: coffee, fruit and pasture, not differing in depth. As for the analysis by grouping, native forest was similar to coffee growing and fruitful showed the greatest dissimilarity between land uses, especially in relation to forest.","PeriodicalId":14884,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Science","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v15n4p1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evaluation of the physical attributes of the soil is of fundamental importance for the understanding of the impacts caused by the different uses in the agricultural systems. In this sense, the objective of this work was to evaluate the changes in physical attributes of the soil in an area with different uses located in the north of Espírito Santo. The experiment followed a randomized block design (DBC), in a 4 × 2 factorial scheme, represented by 4 areas (coffee, fruit, pasture and native forest) and 2 depth classes (0-10 and 10-20 cm), resulting in a total of 8 treatments with 5 replications. The physical attributes evaluated were: texture, Ds (soil density); Dp (particle density); Ma (macroporosity); Mi (microporosity) and Pt (total porosity). The data obtained were submitted to analysis of variance and the comparison of means was performed using the Tukey test at 5%, using the statistical program R© 4.2. Then, the physical attributes data were grouped into a similarity dendrogram, using the Euclidean distance method. The area with native forest presented the best physical attributes of the soil, followed by: coffee, fruit and pasture, not differing in depth. As for the analysis by grouping, native forest was similar to coffee growing and fruitful showed the greatest dissimilarity between land uses, especially in relation to forest.
在Espírito Santo北部不同用途下的Ultisol的物理特性
评估土壤的物理属性对于理解农业系统中不同用途所造成的影响至关重要。从这个意义上说,这项工作的目的是评估位于Espírito Santo北部不同用途地区土壤物理属性的变化。试验采用随机区组设计(DBC),采用4 × 2因子方案,分为4个区(咖啡区、水果区、牧场区和原生林区)和2个深度等级(0-10 cm和10-20 cm),共8个处理,5个重复。评估的物理属性包括:质地、Ds(土壤密度);Dp(颗粒密度);马(大孔隙度);Mi(微孔隙度)和Pt(总孔隙度)。所得数据进行方差分析,均数比较采用5%的Tukey检验,采用统计程序R©4.2。然后,利用欧几里得距离法将物理属性数据分组成相似树状图;有原生林的区域土壤物理属性最好,其次是咖啡、水果和牧场,深度无差异。在分组分析中,原生林与咖啡种植相似,不同土地利用方式之间的差异最大,尤其是与森林相关的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Science
Journal of Agricultural Science 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agricultural Science publishes papers concerned with the advance of agriculture and the use of land resources throughout the world. It publishes original scientific work related to strategic and applied studies in all aspects of agricultural science and exploited species, as well as reviews of scientific topics of current agricultural relevance. Specific topics of interest include (but are not confined to): all aspects of crop and animal physiology, modelling of crop and animal systems, the scientific underpinning of agronomy and husbandry, animal welfare and behaviour, soil science, plant and animal product quality, plant and animal nutrition, engineering solutions, decision support systems, land use, environmental impacts of agriculture and forestry, impacts of climate change, rural biodiversity, experimental design and statistical analysis, and the application of new analytical and study methods (including genetic diversity and molecular biology approaches). The journal also publishes book reviews and letters. Occasional themed issues are published which have recently included centenary reviews, wheat papers and modelling animal systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信