SELECTION IS A MECHANISM: COMMENTARY ON LEÃO & NETO

Q4 Psychology
M. Marr
{"title":"SELECTION IS A MECHANISM: COMMENTARY ON LEÃO & NETO","authors":"M. Marr","doi":"10.5514/RMAC.V44.I2.68543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leao and Neto have presented an interesting and complex history relating to Skinner’s conceptual and empirical evolution of the notion of consequences selecting patterns of behavior.  As these authors are careful to note, terms like “selectionism” and “determinism” (and I would add “mechanism”) have multiple uses in the language and thus attempting to provide anything like a clear picture of just how Skinner changed in his thinking about the nature of the operant over a decade or so of quite active work is more than a challenge.","PeriodicalId":53598,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta","volume":"29 12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5514/RMAC.V44.I2.68543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leao and Neto have presented an interesting and complex history relating to Skinner’s conceptual and empirical evolution of the notion of consequences selecting patterns of behavior.  As these authors are careful to note, terms like “selectionism” and “determinism” (and I would add “mechanism”) have multiple uses in the language and thus attempting to provide anything like a clear picture of just how Skinner changed in his thinking about the nature of the operant over a decade or so of quite active work is more than a challenge.
选择是一种机制:leÃo & neto的评论
Leao和Neto提出了一段有趣而复杂的历史,涉及斯金纳关于结果选择行为模式的概念和经验演变。正如这些作者小心翼翼地指出的那样,“选择主义”和“决定论”(我想加上“机制”)等术语在语言中有多种用途,因此,试图提供任何类似斯金纳在十多年来相当活跃的工作中如何改变他对操作性本质的思考的清晰图景,不仅仅是一个挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta
Revista Mexicana de Analisis de la Conducta Psychology-Applied Psychology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信