Sub-antral volumetric variation after a modified trephine sinus elevation approach: An 8-month prospective study

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
C. Freiha, A. Kassir, N. Ghosn, N. Mokbel, N. Naaman, M. Dagher
{"title":"Sub-antral volumetric variation after a modified trephine sinus elevation approach: An 8-month prospective study","authors":"C. Freiha, A. Kassir, N. Ghosn, N. Mokbel, N. Naaman, M. Dagher","doi":"10.23805/JO.2021.13.04.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To overcome vertical deficiency of atrophic posterior maxilla, sinus floor elevation has been used for several decades either through a transcrestal or a lateral approach. In 1999, Fugazzotto et al. described a modified trephine/osteotome technique for sinus floor augmentation at the time of maxillary molar extraction without implant placement. A trephine was used to create a bone core in the middle of the extraction site and was gently malleted apically. In 2002, Fugazzotto et al. used the same principle to place dental implants in healed maxillary molars sites with limited residual height (RH). This procedure demonstrated a 98.3% implant survival rate at 4 years but lacked radiographic information. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of the modified trephine/osteotome sinus elevation  with implant placement, using a clinical and a radiographic cone beam evaluation. \nMaterials and methods Twenty-one implants were placed in premolar and molar sites with 3≤ RH ≤6mm using the modified trephine/osteotome sinus elevation approach and were evaluated clinically and radiographically at baseline (T1), 3 (T3) and 8 (T8) months. \nResults Implant survival was 100% at 8 months. Sub-antral volumetric bone gain between T1 and T8 was 20.34%. Linear bone gain was 2.1 ± 1.1 mm buccally; 2.0 ± 1.4 mm palatally; 2.5 ± 1.6 mm mesially; and 1.5 ± 1.5 mm distally. Mean linear bone gain was 2.0±1.1 mm  calculated on the CBCT. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) at T1 was 66.378±7.931, and 67.921±14.369 at T3 without a statistically significant difference between the two measurements. Residual height was positively correlated to vestibular, palatal, and mesial bone gain. Signs of Schneiderian membrane tearing were  noticeable in one case. \nConclusion This study demonstrated that sufficient subantral bone formation can be obtained with the modified trephine/osteotome technique with high implant survival rate and low post-operative morbidity.","PeriodicalId":42724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osseointegration","volume":"29 1","pages":"227-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osseointegration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2021.13.04.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim To overcome vertical deficiency of atrophic posterior maxilla, sinus floor elevation has been used for several decades either through a transcrestal or a lateral approach. In 1999, Fugazzotto et al. described a modified trephine/osteotome technique for sinus floor augmentation at the time of maxillary molar extraction without implant placement. A trephine was used to create a bone core in the middle of the extraction site and was gently malleted apically. In 2002, Fugazzotto et al. used the same principle to place dental implants in healed maxillary molars sites with limited residual height (RH). This procedure demonstrated a 98.3% implant survival rate at 4 years but lacked radiographic information. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of the modified trephine/osteotome sinus elevation  with implant placement, using a clinical and a radiographic cone beam evaluation. Materials and methods Twenty-one implants were placed in premolar and molar sites with 3≤ RH ≤6mm using the modified trephine/osteotome sinus elevation approach and were evaluated clinically and radiographically at baseline (T1), 3 (T3) and 8 (T8) months. Results Implant survival was 100% at 8 months. Sub-antral volumetric bone gain between T1 and T8 was 20.34%. Linear bone gain was 2.1 ± 1.1 mm buccally; 2.0 ± 1.4 mm palatally; 2.5 ± 1.6 mm mesially; and 1.5 ± 1.5 mm distally. Mean linear bone gain was 2.0±1.1 mm  calculated on the CBCT. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) at T1 was 66.378±7.931, and 67.921±14.369 at T3 without a statistically significant difference between the two measurements. Residual height was positively correlated to vestibular, palatal, and mesial bone gain. Signs of Schneiderian membrane tearing were  noticeable in one case. Conclusion This study demonstrated that sufficient subantral bone formation can be obtained with the modified trephine/osteotome technique with high implant survival rate and low post-operative morbidity.
改良的环形窦抬高入路后窦下容积变化:一项为期8个月的前瞻性研究
目的为了克服萎缩的后上颌骨的垂直缺损,窦底提升术已经应用了几十年,无论是通过经颅入路还是外侧入路。1999年,Fugazzotto等人描述了一种改良的套管/截骨技术,用于上颌磨牙拔牙时的窦底提升,无需植入种植体。在拔牙部位的中间使用环钻形成骨核,并在根尖轻轻锤击。2002年,Fugazzotto等人使用相同的原理将种植体放置在残高有限的上颌磨牙愈合部位。该手术显示4年种植体存活率为98.3%,但缺乏放射学信息。本研究的目的是通过临床和影像学的锥束评估来评估改良的环钻/截骨窦抬高与种植体放置的疗效。材料与方法采用改良的套管/截骨窦抬高入路将21颗种植体放置在3≤RH≤6mm的前磨牙和磨牙部位,并于基线(T1)、3 (T3)和8 (T8)个月进行临床和影像学评估。结果8个月种植体成活率100%。T1和T8间腔下骨体积增加20.34%。口腔线性骨增重为2.1±1.1 mm;上颌2.0±1.4 mm;内侧2.5±1.6 mm;远端1.5±1.5 mm。CBCT计算的平均线性骨增重为2.0±1.1 mm。T1时种植体稳定商(ISQ)为66.378±7.931,T3时为67.921±14.369,两者差异无统计学意义。剩余高度与前庭骨、腭骨和中内侧骨增重呈正相关。一例可见施耐德膜撕裂的迹象。结论改良的套管/截骨术可获得足够的腹下骨形成,种植体成活率高,术后发病率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Osseointegration
Journal of Osseointegration DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信